marsupilami_4
Active member
Hello everyone!
I know this is a little bit off-topic but I thought I'd get more relevant answers posting here since the situation involves location sound equipment.
A friend of mine wants me to record the score for a short film he shot.
There's going to be a violin, an upright (acoustic) bass and a piano, all playing together simultaneously. I most likely won't have time to experiment before the actual recording session.
In terms of equipment I have an AKG SE300 hyper, a Sennheiser MKH416 shotgun, a couple Lectro's 210D with either a sanken cos11 or a sony ECM77 lavalier (it will depend on whether or not I buy the sanken before it happens), an SQN 4-channel mixer and a 2-channel digital audio interface to connect to my laptop. I will be using Logic Pro.
I know that this is far from optimal for music recording, but there's no budget whatsoever to rent anything else, let alone consider a recording studio, so that'll have to do.
Here's what I was thinking:
Track 1 for violin and bass using the 416 for the violin and a lav for the bass.
Track 2 for the piano using the SE300.
I already had a chance to experiment with the 416 on the violin and am happy with the results.
My main concerns are:
- will the lav do a good enough job with the upright bass, esp. considering it'll go through the lectro, which might chop off or distort some of the low end? (I don't have an adapter to plug a lav straight to the mixer yet)
- I don't know yet what kind of piano will be used, but do you think I'll be able to work around the SE300's directivity while being close enough to the piano that it doesn't sound too distant?
Alternatively I thought I could use the SE300 for the bass and a lav for the piano, the reasoning being that it might be easier to work with the lav's omni pattern.
I know that the best way to find out is to experiment with various configurations but I don't know how much time I'll have to play around, and a little bit of thinking beforehand will probably help me be more efficient.
So what do you think? Would you consider a different approach, and if yes which one?
Thank you!
Alexis
I know this is a little bit off-topic but I thought I'd get more relevant answers posting here since the situation involves location sound equipment.
A friend of mine wants me to record the score for a short film he shot.
There's going to be a violin, an upright (acoustic) bass and a piano, all playing together simultaneously. I most likely won't have time to experiment before the actual recording session.
In terms of equipment I have an AKG SE300 hyper, a Sennheiser MKH416 shotgun, a couple Lectro's 210D with either a sanken cos11 or a sony ECM77 lavalier (it will depend on whether or not I buy the sanken before it happens), an SQN 4-channel mixer and a 2-channel digital audio interface to connect to my laptop. I will be using Logic Pro.
I know that this is far from optimal for music recording, but there's no budget whatsoever to rent anything else, let alone consider a recording studio, so that'll have to do.
Here's what I was thinking:
Track 1 for violin and bass using the 416 for the violin and a lav for the bass.
Track 2 for the piano using the SE300.
I already had a chance to experiment with the 416 on the violin and am happy with the results.
My main concerns are:
- will the lav do a good enough job with the upright bass, esp. considering it'll go through the lectro, which might chop off or distort some of the low end? (I don't have an adapter to plug a lav straight to the mixer yet)
- I don't know yet what kind of piano will be used, but do you think I'll be able to work around the SE300's directivity while being close enough to the piano that it doesn't sound too distant?
Alternatively I thought I could use the SE300 for the bass and a lav for the piano, the reasoning being that it might be easier to work with the lav's omni pattern.
I know that the best way to find out is to experiment with various configurations but I don't know how much time I'll have to play around, and a little bit of thinking beforehand will probably help me be more efficient.
So what do you think? Would you consider a different approach, and if yes which one?
Thank you!
Alexis