My search for a new camera begins here, experienced NEX-FS700 & PMW-200 users welcome

True North

Well-known member
My search for a new camera begins here, experienced NEX-FS700 & PMW-200 users welcome

Hi Everyone

Happy New Year!! This is my first day posting on DVX. Thanks to everyone who has shared their experience thus far! It has been helpful and greatly appreciated. To get up to speed quickly, I'm going to go over a little bit about myself and my situation. I have been shooting for the past 4 years. Started out shooting my kids hockey games on consumer gear and then caught the gear bug. I have been offered to do a couple of money making things with my equipment but have so far resisted. Recently I have been inspired to do a video project/documentary on competitive minor league hockey, so my personal interest and goals with this hobby have steadily grown into something bigger.

I am now on my fourth camcorder. I am currently shooting on a Canon HF-G10 which is about as good as you are going to get in the consumer realm. By consumer standards, my Canon does allow for lots of manual control but many important manual controls are menu driven and it's just not laid out as well the pro camera's. I am also hoping to get better overall image quality from my new purchase. I should also note that I shoot almost entirely on sticks, so having a hand held or shoulder mount option is not big for me.

My primary focus with this new camera search is on covering my core needs first and right now I am shooting lots of minor league hockey footage, which by studio standards means, always shooting in very diverse lighting situations ranging from hideous to worse. Needless to say excellent low light performance is very important for my purposes. I also need a camera with excellent auto focus, which I need when shooting game footage. I know auto-focus is not considered a very pro feature, but it is important in my case.

With game footage I am dealing with very high contrast shooting scenarios. I am most often shooting bright white ice with fast moving players in strong dark contrast colored uniforms. I can often shoot from an elevated vantage point at or near centre ice in most cases. More challenging vantage points are when I am shooting at one end of the ice tight along the boards through the protective glass. I want a camera that can handle the aforementioned scenarios with very high degrees of sharpness and clarity.

So this has all lead me to look into getting a pro camera/camcorder and my hope in posting here is to get some honest feedback from users on some of the cameras I am looking at. My current list of potential cameras is as follows.

1) Panasonic AG-HPX250P -&- Panasonic AG-AC 160

I now these are different cameras but from what I understand they have the same sensors and lens. I think I understand the technical differences between the two. I was pretty set on trying these out but then came across a YouTube comparison between a 250 and a HVX200a. The video hi lighted poor low light performance from the 250. While sharpness from the 250 was better than the HVX200a, the large 22x lens seemed to be doing it best impersonation of a black hole, sucking away all of the available light. I was pretty disappointed with the posted results to say the least. It's still in the running but I am a little gun shy. I would love to hear some feedback;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOW-T_sg5EI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

2) Sony PMW-200 XD Cam

After witnessing the some of the weaknesses on the Pannys I started to take a closer look at the Sony PMW-200 XD Cam. I figured that the larger sensors and smaller zoom lens (still plenty for my purposes) would on paper yield better low light performance. The only downside at this point is that the camera is new and their isn't much real world experience to draw on. This might be a good rental option to test out. I would appreciate any feedback on this camera

3) Sony NEX- FS700

This was an easy option to be wowed with early on, but while most of my shooting isn't 'run & gun' in the strictest sense, it is closer to that method of shooting than anything I can think of. I drooled over the slo-mo options on the NEX- FS700, but I figured I could over crank or shoot 60p on the other cameras I was looking at. It's not as nice as 120 or 240 fps but I realize their is no perfect camera for me. Other bonuses for this cam was good low light performance and the best depth of field on paper out of all the cameras I was looking at. I had pretty much written this camera off as it seemed too complicated for my purposes and experience level. That being said I don't need to be up and running out of the gate with this camera, I have time to learn it. I also came across a posted video showing off the auto focus capabilities of the Sony Alpha lenses....and just like that, this camera was back on the list.

3) JVC GY-HM650 ProHD

This camera is even newer than the PMW-200, I think it gets officially released today (Dec 31). Given that the release date is today, their is little to no real world experience or feedback to draw from. I am not in a huge rush to make a decision on this camera, so I will wait if this option shows promise.

Finishing Points

If anyone has any feedback or suggestion I am all ears. If you need any further information please feel free to ask.

As a further note, I live in Toronto so I will have good access to these items through rental. I don't know what the site protocol here is but I would like to post this question in various parts of this forum as they relate to my different camera choices. Not sure if this breaks some forum conduct rules but I think my question is relevant to various parts of this site as some users who may be able to give feedback will not come to threads related to other gear they don't use. I have already started a thread in the Panasonic portion of this forum, here is the link if you are interested in following the progress of that discussion;

http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthrea...users-appreciated&p=1986257003#post1986257003
 
Well, i only have experience with the HVX200 (the traditional one) but as the HVX200a has been released in 2008 and the HPX250 in 2011 if i am correct, there should be a really visible difference between them in terms of video quality. I would not believe this test on youtube - the messed up white balance speaks for itself... I would say that the HPX250 is a bit overkill for your purposes, a friend owns an AC160 and is very satisfied with its lowlight capabilities, coming from VX1000 though lol.
you should check out the Sony FS100 too, has a few drawbacks from the FS700 but you can get sharp 1080p60 for 3000 or 4000 bucks used and its lowlight capabilities are great - it also shares the same AF system if i am right...

cheers

Steve
 
Thanks for the reply Stefan and happy new year. I had also been considering FS100 as well but I'm an 'all in' kind of guy. If I was going to have a go in this platform I would probably just go with the FS700. It is clearly more than I need but I also like that the 700 is Sony's third kick at the can in this camera range which gives them some time to engineer out some of the quirks of their earlier versions. I am pretty sure the 100 accepts all of the same lenses as the 700 including Sony's A Mount Alpha lens series which had very good AF.

I haven't given up hope on the Panny's yet and I am also going to give the AC90 a kick at the can. I may end up renting both the 160 and the 90.
 
My vote is on the FS700 but definitely rent it first. Vistek will probably apply the rental fee to a purchase but I'm not sure on that.
 
Just realized a pretty serious limitation on my plans for the NEX700. The Alpha series lenses, whose AF i was relying on, don't have any Servo Zoom models available that I am aware of, which pretty much makes the 700 a no go.....for now. The lens that ships with the 700 does have servo zoom but I am not sure if it offers the same 'Parfocal' AF that the Alpha lenses use. From what I understand Sony is making new servo style lenses. Anything they can do to make a robust lens with excellent AF and smooth zoom will only work towards expanding the potential base for this camera.
 
Just realized a pretty serious limitation on my plans for the NEX700. The Alpha series lenses, whose AF i was relying on, don't have any Servo Zoom models available that I am aware of, which pretty much makes the 700 a no go.....for now. The lens that ships with the 700 does have servo zoom but I am not sure if it offers the same 'Parfocal' AF that the Alpha lenses use. From what I understand Sony is making new servo style lenses. Anything they can do to make a robust lens with excellent AF and smooth zoom will only work towards expanding the potential base for this camera.

Look at the new SEL18200PZ (power zoom) lens which comes with the EA50. It is a 18-200mm servo zoom NEX E-mount lens with the same optics as the 18-200 kit lens that goes straight on the FS700. It is already available bundled with the EA50 and should be coming out sold separately in the next month or so. I played with one on an FS700 a few months ago and was pretty impressed. Sony says the FS700 and other cameras will get a firmware upgrade soon to allow use of the camera's grip-mounted-zoom-rocker with the lens, but when I used it the lens was quite useable just with the zoom rocker right on the lens. The control on the lens was right in the spot where your finger would normally be to control focus/zoom manually anyway so it makes a lot of sense.
 
FS700 all the way, however you can get a great deal on a used FS100 right now. Give the 700 a rental and see how you like it. If you don't need internal ND, and all the slo mo frame rates go for the FS100.
 
Look at the new SEL18200PZ (power zoom) lens which comes with the EA50. It is a 18-200mm servo zoom NEX E-mount lens with the same optics as the 18-200 kit lens that goes straight on the FS700. It is already available bundled with the EA50 and should be coming out sold separately in the next month or so. I played with one on an FS700 a few months ago and was pretty impressed. Sony says the FS700 and other cameras will get a firmware upgrade soon to allow use of the camera's grip-mounted-zoom-rocker with the lens, but when I used it the lens was quite useable just with the zoom rocker right on the lens. The control on the lens was right in the spot where your finger would normally be to control focus/zoom manually anyway so it makes a lot of sense.

Thanks for the suggestion Noah, I wonder if that lens is operable with a remote lanc? If not than I can't really use it for my purposes. Also part of what reinvigorated my interest in using this camera is the Auto Focus used in the A mount alpha series lenses. I know this cam was not designed to be 'run and gun' but if you can create a lens with great AF and solid zoom capabilities you really open this camera up to whole different range of users.

The solution seems simple enough. They have already designed a working servo zoom lens for the 700, now all they need to do is program that lens with the Parfocal focus software. Maybe easier said then done but I think it is definitely doable.


By the way, here is the 'Parfocal' Auto focus video on the A mount Alpha lenses.


http://vimeo.com/41323029

I'm sure most have seen this vid already but I post it just in case
 
Last edited:
I own an fs700 and I love it. The cinegamma curves will help you with your contrast problem. Low light performance is great. I think you will find the slow motion quite valuable to get some accent shots (You can shoot continuously and just stop when you have something you think you want to keep). The main issue is lenses. I like the kit lens, but I think you would find the autofocus frustratingly slow for hockey (I haven't tried it for fast sports though). I haven't used the servo lens, but I suspect the autofocus is also slow. Yes, I've seen the David Leitner video, and I was impressed too, but the question comes down to "which alpha lens?" I don't think there are any servo lenses. Manually zooming isn't that difficult however, particularly if the lens is tracking focus. And you know about the LA-EA2 f3.5 aperature problem, right? More a frustration than a deal killer. This camera can be a little frustrating at times, but you will either fall in love with it or you won't.
 
I own an EX1 and an FS100 (kind of a gen behind your choice set but the same)

I think it is important to realise they are very different, especially at sport/event coverage

Zoom and focus and reach are your issues

You are not gonna find a lens for the 700 that the 200 will do its onboard lens

Operating a S35 large chipped camera demands far more finesse than a smaller chipped camera

Really to get something from the 700 you will need to be interested in cinematography and the process, the other camera is almost fire and forget

Neither are bad, the 700 could be an exceptional camera, but it will be fully engaging to use for sports event coverage

A crack at indoor sport with an Fs100 and nikon 70-200.. https://vimeo.com/51875418

S
 
Back
Top