My JVC HD110 with 35mm or a Red camera... ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

pixeltv

Member
Hi friends,

I do not see difference of quality (in the image) between my JVC HD110 with 35mm adapter (+ Nikon 50mm F1.8D) and a Red Camera.

In the great screen the difference is seen...?

Red Camera:

http://red.cachefly.net/video/crossing1.mov

-------

HDV cameras with M2 adapter:

http://www.redrockmicro.com/footage/HVX200/nothinggold.mov

http://www.redrockmicro.com/footage/HVX200/spot_keyton.mov

http://www.redrockmicro.com/footage/JVC/metro_www.mov

http://www.redrockmicro.com/footage/HVX200/karcher_stringer.mov

-------

Pardon for my ignorance!

:thumbsup:

PTV
 
That's some nice footage, but look at it on something more then a 500x350 pixel screen. Take it through a DI suit and see how the footage holds up. I am not dissing the HD110, it produces beautiful footage. But RED and 35 are in a different league all together.
 
Yeah, you really have to see RED displayed in an enviroment that does it justice (and there aren't many places that do!!) to truly appriciate the quality it produces.

- Mikko
 
My present applications with my HD110 and 250 are documentary for TV and/or productions for DVD , industrial promotions, music clips...

I will not make a long film with my present cameras, but now I do not see difference (to the eye) of using my cameras and my 35mm adapter with a Red.

If I see the difference of use a Sony Z1 or a HVX200 and 35mm adapters, with my HD110 in the same conditions (aperture, light, speed and more).

Are comparative videos with a camera “X” (example HD250) and a RED camera…?

Thanks again.

PTV
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top