More traffic at dvx100



Would it be too harsh to say that the "democratization of film" killed off indie film? I don't know, but I think a case could be made for it. I think when things were harder, it really sorted the wheat from the chaff and the mixed metaphor continues in saying that the cream really did rise to the top back then. Now there's so much chaff it's harder to find the wheat.



I'm not sure either... but it certainly has devalued film and video. Times have certainly changed from early on when you would have to wear a shirt and tie to operate a video tape machine (those operators were called engineers), the technical acumen required to operate was very steep. Fast forward to today… Now walk into a Network Television media room... be prepared to be greeted with shorts and flip flops (shower shoes)! Are todays media professionals as technically savvy as yesteryear? Nope. Do they have to be? Nope. Would those statements attract argument? Yep. Have we gotten to the point where thinking technically is less and less as important or valued as it used to be?… yeah those mini-brains (computers), inside practically every piece of anything have sorta taken the load off. Ideally you would think, great, that leaves more time to think creatively... hasn't quite panned out has it?


Too many folks almost expect you to work for next to free if not free while expecting a Hollywood blockbuster from your typical crew of two-three people. Where has this mindset come from? Can’t quite put a finger on it… leaving only a few players that can survive and or persevere through that crushing chaff of “I have a camera, therefore I’m a filmmaker”. The profession itself maybe it’s own worst enemy. The best edited pieces look like they weren’t edited. The best camera work does not call attention to the camera. Making it look easy. I’ve even gone so far as to tell clients “just because I make it look easy, doesn’t mean that it is”. The artistry and craftsmanship is always a challenge to gain appreciation from the uninitiated, also known as an audience. There was a time when a 21 point Nielsen Rating was considered a hit... today a 2.1 is doing phenomenal. Different era... the whole paradigm has shifted in TV and Film... some good, some not so good.
 
It is interesting how many people do ask for or even sometimes expect blockbuster high end quality, and for super cheap.
How did we get to here? We've gotten used to seeing big effects and huge budget tv and cinema....then add to the mix the DSLR kids and resulting cheap prices...and somehow we've put the two together?
 
I have to jump in here and say, that for all the expectations of super high quality work in all aspects, there is as well an unbearable amount of bad work out there on our screens. I can't say how often, but my wife sure could, that I am found yelling at the tv "Focus!! Why would you use that shot? Focus!" Just watch PBS, there are several food shows that seem to feel out of focus shots are acceptable or perhaps its a style statement... Personally I don't give a damn what you shoot on, just do it well and honour your contract with the intended viewer. It amazes me that these amateurs get contracts and funding for their projects. Maybe it is hip to be out of focus.... I will never be hip.
 
I guess I'm too new and peripheral to this business to pine for the old days, but it seems to me that a lot of the questions here answer themselves. Fighting for a 2.1 share instead of a 21 share means you want stuff fast and cheap. From the old paradigm about, "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick two", the answer becomes clear.

And sure there's more content now and a whole flood of crap, but come on. The best work now is gorgeous. There are still artists and expert technicians steadily doing their thing.

Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is
Rapidly agin'
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'.

Addendum: I just saw the comedy short the White House produced for the correspondents dinner, and if you don't like bad DSLR work, this will make you stab your eyes with forks. https://youtu.be/NxFkEj7KPC0?t=23m47s
 
Last edited:
Trilemmas and Dylan... Cool :) ok... Let's give Mr. Dylan a chance to finish.

The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The slow one now will later be fast
As the present now will later be past
The order is rapidly fadin'
And the first one now will later be last
For the times they are a-changin'

Agreed... The best of today's stuff blows yesteryear's out of the water... There was plenty of crap to go around back then too.
 
Ya know, when I read that stuff now blows away stuff from yesteryear I think of one name,
Disjecta!
Otherwise known as Steven Dempsey. This guy was shooting stuff so beautiful a decade ago, and on SD! I haven't seen anyone yet to compare. Not sure if he still frequents these boards but if you ever get the chance checkout some of his shorts, and remember most were shot in SD, usually on a DVX. Think he also had a Canon camera as well. His stuff was so well lit and shot that he uprezzed to HD when that became possible through software and the stuff held up no problem.

13 years ago, before consumer level HD cams, before HDSLRs, you really had to know what you were doing to get beautiful images. Now, you can spend a couple of hundred bucks, get a DSLR, get that to often used shallow focus and shaky hand held footage, and you are good to go.

Now, I am not making this personal, just my observations after watching hundreds of hours of footage on YouTube and VIMEO.

EDIT: Here is one of Stevens films shot on a DVX100. Here's the thing, Steven not only knows what to point his camera at, he knows what to do with the image once he gets it in the view finder. Beautiful stuff. Still a big fan.
https://vimeo.com/705874

Sorry, just gushing here. These images are so good I can easily imagine them in any big budget feature film! Steven should give classes in cinematography.
 
Last edited:
I'm happy that I got to live in part of the time before YouTube and HDSLRs and all the new kids on the block regardless of age focusing so much on the gear at hand. I'll be 26 in december so i am still a youngin in a lot of your guys' eyes and i've had the filmmaking bug since 1999 when i got my first camera as a fluke xmas gift (JVC DVM90) to then being introduced to the Sony PD150 in 2002 and realized it was my calling (yada yada).. i have to say, creating in those pre DSLR, everyone with a camera (even an iphone now) thinks they are a filmmaker.. it was a good time.. the very beginning of the digital revolution was an amazing time. I remember being introduced to the DVX100 when i was 13 in 2003 and got my own DVX 2 years later.. it was my first prosumer camera and i learned a lot off of it. When the Nikon D90 and Canon 5D MKII dropped i remember saying to a friend "they are going to ruin everything" and sure enough, they did. As long as the DOF is shallow, you are shooting the most relevant resolution and in 24p you are deemed a pro.. its ridiculous. And so many people starting out are throwing half of the art of cinematography away and shooting flat and grading with LUTS.. what happened to pushing these digital cameras to get the look in camera as close and just minor tweaks in post.. everyone wants to shoot LOG now but doesnt fully understand what they are doing... it's crazy. I wish i could relive a nice fall day in 2007 with my DVX or Canon XL2. I dont like how everything basically looks the same regardless of what camera you are shooting on, like i said earlier here.. no personality. Its part of the reason why i support older tech more so than new (not just because i cant afford a RED or ALEXA).. I love LOVE my Varicam and I actually had a friend drop their HDSLR and are looking into an older cam themselves.. its always to each his own i guess, but there was something magical about where i started and i think every filmmaker has this regardless the tech at their time starting.. FILM, HD, DV, HDSLR, etc.. im from the end of the DV generation and im happy to be apart of it and miss it greatly...

...final note.. for those of you interested in seeing great films shot on cameras you can get on ebay now for $300 or less.. look into a company that was based out of new york called InDigEnt (Independent Digital Entertainment).. the late Garry Winick ran the show for them and their films like Personal Velocity (shot on the pal PD150) and November (shot on the DVX100.. im sure a few of you know of this as DVXuser interviewed the DP back in the day) and you really can see some SD films that really (i think) still hold up well in this age of HD and 4k, etc.
 
Back
Top