legrevedotcom
Veteran
I just spotted a 2nd hand seller with the following lenses for sale. From the photos they look to be in pretty good condition:
- Carl Zeiss Sonar 135, F2.8 (Contax mount) --- $145
- Carl Zeiss Planar 50, F1.7 (Contax mount) --- $120
- Canon FD 50, F1.4 --- $235
- Canon FD 35-105 Macro, F3.5 --- $135
Which would you go for first if any, and do you reckon I would lose too much quality with a converter on any of these?
Thanks
EDIT: Thought it would be useful for you to know what I have already... I'm just tempted by the whole prime thing. I have the following lenses in stock:
- Stock 18-200
- Sony 16mm
- Sony Wide angle adapter
- Canon EF 24-70 2.8L
- Canon EF 70-200 2.8L II
- Canon 100mm macro 2.8L
Maybe the 2nd hands are more nice to have than need to have?
- Carl Zeiss Sonar 135, F2.8 (Contax mount) --- $145
- Carl Zeiss Planar 50, F1.7 (Contax mount) --- $120
- Canon FD 50, F1.4 --- $235
- Canon FD 35-105 Macro, F3.5 --- $135
Which would you go for first if any, and do you reckon I would lose too much quality with a converter on any of these?
Thanks
EDIT: Thought it would be useful for you to know what I have already... I'm just tempted by the whole prime thing. I have the following lenses in stock:
- Stock 18-200
- Sony 16mm
- Sony Wide angle adapter
- Canon EF 24-70 2.8L
- Canon EF 70-200 2.8L II
- Canon 100mm macro 2.8L
Maybe the 2nd hands are more nice to have than need to have?
Last edited: