I recently bought some Alzo CFL bulbs to test. I want to figure out how much of a hue is being introduced so that I know how to properly gel it/set my camera to get the correct colors.
I set my white balance to 5500K, what Alzo claims their bulbs are, and took a picture of a white/black/grey card. I then import the JPEG image into LR (the jpeg has the baked camera settings in it, LR does funky stuff when importing RAW images). I eye-drop the grey card, some adjustments are made (increase to +31 magenta and +4 blue). So, I bumped up my color temp to 5700K and shifted the magenta in camera to +4. This all but removed the green shift entirely and was correctly white balanced.
Is there any disadvantage to fixing the color in camera like this as opposed to using gels?
Thanks!
EDIT: I also noticed that if I eye-dropped different spots of the grey card, I get different readings (about a +5/-5 tint and temp difference). Is this because the exposure was not even across the entire surface and is it negligible?
I set my white balance to 5500K, what Alzo claims their bulbs are, and took a picture of a white/black/grey card. I then import the JPEG image into LR (the jpeg has the baked camera settings in it, LR does funky stuff when importing RAW images). I eye-drop the grey card, some adjustments are made (increase to +31 magenta and +4 blue). So, I bumped up my color temp to 5700K and shifted the magenta in camera to +4. This all but removed the green shift entirely and was correctly white balanced.
Is there any disadvantage to fixing the color in camera like this as opposed to using gels?
Thanks!
EDIT: I also noticed that if I eye-dropped different spots of the grey card, I get different readings (about a +5/-5 tint and temp difference). Is this because the exposure was not even across the entire surface and is it negligible?
Last edited: