Anyway, I keep hearing this theory that eventually the junk mortgages will have value again, and the taxpayers (i.e. the government) could even make a profit. If that's true -- if they really believed that -- then why bail out the banks at all? Let them wait for the profit potential to resurface on these mortgages, and cash in then. .
I'm not an economist but the conventional wisdom is that this financial crisis has frozen credit. The global economy MUST have credit to sustain, even at the lowest level. For example, a small production house with 20 employees might need a line of credit to meet their payroll, they've got projects lined up but they're 3 weeks away from getting a check--they're between jobs as it were. Uh oh, no credit from the bank, so 7 employees get laid off. Now seven people buy less groceries, don't patronize the local pizzaria, ooops they can't pay the rent or make the car payment. Cars are repo'd, landlords can't make THEIR car payment because a certain former production house employee didn't pay his rent. And so it goes.
Credit is perfectly accepted instrument of the free market, a cash only/pay as you go economy doesn't seem to be something anyone considers. Credit is fine provided it's managed. The trick is finding that happy balance between regulation and free market. Right now most would say we strayed too far toward an unfettered market.
The economists are saying the US economy's fundamentals are for the most part sound, but there's a psychology to economics and the concern is panic, which in turn could cause bank runs, dumping stocks, things like that could create an economic death spiral.
Last edited: