a similar querie was made but i didnt get the answer i was looking for..
its not about preproduction set design, lighting, framing and picking out object's/colors that contribute to film look.
the main criterion of concern is when making a comparason of a frame between a shady grey sky pre and post with magic bullet.
the original image has much detail of the grey cloudy sky.
the image with magic bullet (no matter what preset i use) overexposes the grey cloudy sky leaving hardly any detail of the fluffy nature.
the preset i mainly start off with is the most subtle "basic" then i back away some features (that helps a little) for more subtlety.
now, im aware that contrast ratio of video is not equal to film, however, there is much detail of the sky in the original footage to begin with, so why is it overexposing sky?
its not about preproduction set design, lighting, framing and picking out object's/colors that contribute to film look.
the main criterion of concern is when making a comparason of a frame between a shady grey sky pre and post with magic bullet.
the original image has much detail of the grey cloudy sky.
the image with magic bullet (no matter what preset i use) overexposes the grey cloudy sky leaving hardly any detail of the fluffy nature.
the preset i mainly start off with is the most subtle "basic" then i back away some features (that helps a little) for more subtlety.
now, im aware that contrast ratio of video is not equal to film, however, there is much detail of the sky in the original footage to begin with, so why is it overexposing sky?