Mac Pro 3k = hackintosh 1.2k + GH1 1.6k

Yeah I think when I get the hackintosh I will also get windows 7 on a separate hardrive. I don't have any functioning windows machines so it will be good to have one. Also the machine I am referencing for $1150 has

Specs:
- Intel Q9400 3.2 GHz Core 2 Quad Processor (4 cores! Overclocked to 3.2 Ghz each!)
- 4 GB Dual Channel RAM (expandable up to 16 GB)
- 750 GB 7200.11 RPM Western Digital Caviar Black SATA Hard Drive (add in another hard drive with Windows Vista for $120 extra)
- 22X Dual Layer SuperDrive
- 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 GeForce 9600 GT Video Card w/ Dual DVI Outputs
- 10 USB Ports
- 2 Firewire 400 Ports
- 2 eSATA Ports
- 6 Available SATA ports (for expansion)
- 2 Gigabit Ethernet ports
In an Antec Three Hundred case (pic below), with a 680 Watt Power Supply.

i'd really find out if the guy who's selling you that computer tells you what motherboard he's using before you jump ship. hackintosh's mobo compatibility has gotten alot bigger, but some out there are still buggy.
 
This just smacks of a bad idea. You don't need a top of the line machine for video editing...buy the cheapest 13" Macbook Pro.

You can log and transfer your footage to AIC, edit it, and relog and reconnect to ProRes. I've been editing this stuff with no problems on mid-range white macbook and iMacs from years ago.

Hackintosh you're dealing with a lack of driver support, potentially unstable platform, and apple trying to break your computer everytime they release a software update. Hackintosh works great for netbooks and other simple machines but I would not use it for a high end editing computer.

I think that was exactly why I didn't want to pay double the price because I am not doing highend computing. Just editing some prosumer at best video. Is it possible to edit avchd in realtime? I do some music and video in my spare time nothing I am doing is mission critical. I won't be using it for work. But with that said I do own a macbook pro, macbook (wife mac), and G5 so maybe I will test the workflow on my macbook. If that seems to work fast enough maybe that would be the way to go as I can be mobile, but I normally have my work macbook pro with me. Decisions decisions!

This is only made possible by the GH1 before I was looking at 4k just for a prosumer camera. I love it!:thumbsup:
 
This just smacks of a bad idea. You don't need a top of the line machine for video editing...buy the cheapest 13" Macbook Pro.

You can log and transfer your footage to AIC, edit it, and relog and reconnect to ProRes. I've been editing this stuff with no problems on mid-range white macbook and iMacs from years ago.

Hackintosh you're dealing with a lack of driver support, potentially unstable platform, and apple trying to break your computer everytime they release a software update. Hackintosh works great for netbooks and other simple machines but I would not use it for a high end editing computer.

You must spend a lot of time rendering! Totally a good option if you have the patience/foresight to plan out renders while you sleep etc.
 
Yeah I think when I get the hackintosh I will also get windows 7 on a separate hardrive. I don't have any functioning windows machines so it will be good to have one. Also the machine I am referencing for $1150 has

Specs:
- Intel Q9400 3.2 GHz Core 2 Quad Processor (4 cores! Overclocked to 3.2 Ghz each!)
- 4 GB Dual Channel RAM (expandable up to 16 GB)
- 750 GB 7200.11 RPM Western Digital Caviar Black SATA Hard Drive (add in another hard drive with Windows Vista for $120 extra)
- 22X Dual Layer SuperDrive
- 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 GeForce 9600 GT Video Card w/ Dual DVI Outputs
- 10 USB Ports
- 2 Firewire 400 Ports
- 2 eSATA Ports
- 6 Available SATA ports (for expansion)
- 2 Gigabit Ethernet ports
In an Antec Three Hundred case (pic below), with a 680 Watt Power Supply.

It's worth it to upgrade an get a core i7 920 chip instead. It's going to be significantly faster. http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/amdphenomiix4965_081209165043/19683.png

That link is a good chart for showing the difference in speed. Though IF that overclock is rock-solid stable, you'll be getting close to i7 performance.
 
If the real product is the "Mac Pro", then maybe a better name for the hackintosh would be the "Mac Amateur". Seems fitting....
 
...

Yep but both of those OS's are just about to come out so they'll be presumably a bit buggy.

Also, I'd run each OS on a different HD... pretty sure you can do this and I don't think that OSX and Windows use the same file format system. (NTFS vs FAT I believe... actually not exactly sure :P )

It's NTFS (Win) and HFS+ (Apple)
 
well this has been interesting.
Anyone- Which is the best approach here for MULTI BOOT you think:

windows 7 + snow leoapard?

Both these operating systems will run on the system so you can just run two hard drives (or partitions) and pick your boot disk in the bootloader.
The Apple OSX one should work, if not you can use GRUB
 
To get my feet wet with OSX, I got myself a Dell Mini 9. Very easy to hackintosh it with all the tools and guides available online. Those guys sure made this easy.

As nicely as it runs on the mini, I can't imagine anyone would actually use a hackintoshed laptop. The awesome Apple touchpad makes half the OSX experience. Soon after I bought myself a Macbook Pro.

I've been building computers since 386SX. If I was going to be doing serious work with an OSX app, it's not going to be on a hackintosh.
 
Both these operating systems will run on the system so you can just run two hard drives (or partitions) and pick your boot disk in the bootloader.
The Apple OSX one should work, if not you can use GRUB


Im really concerned about the hardware. I realized I would DEFINATELY build
this, NOT buy. I would like to follow an i7 plan though, someone whos
recently put together "certified" parts that work.

Not sure what hardware piece is INTREGAL to getting the OSX to run.

thats obviously the FIRST step.
 
Back
Top