Looks like they'll have to re-render Jurassic Park

Batutta

Major Contributor
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070920/ap_on_sc/feathered_raptor

WASHINGTON - Velociraptor, the terrifying predator made famous in the movie "Jurassic Park," appears to have had feathers in real life.

A close study of a velociraptor forearm found in Mongolia shows the presence of quill knobs, bumps on the bone where the feathers anchor, researchers report in Friday's edition of the journal Science.

Dinosaurs are believed to be ancestors to modern birds. Evidence of feathered dinosaurs has been found in recent years, and now velociraptor can be added to that list.

"Finding quill knobs on velociraptor ... means that it definitely had feathers. This is something we'd long suspected, but no one had been able to prove," Alan Turner, lead author on the study and a graduate student of paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History and at Columbia University in New York, said in a statement.

The velociraptor the researchers studied was about three feet tall and weighed about 30 pounds. The size of these animals was exaggerated in the movie.

It had short forelimbs, compared to a modern bird, the researchers said, indicating it would not have been able to fly, even though it had feathers.

The feathers may have been useful for display, to shield nests, for temperature control or to help it maneuver while running, they said.
 
But the fearsome death-lizards in Jurassic Park were really more like Deinonychi, than Velociraptors.

They called them 'velociraptors' because it sounds cool.

walters_deinonychus.jpg



deinonychus ^

velociraptor_5.jpg



velociraptor ^
 
Last edited:
Didn't they have a few little feathers in the third movie? Yuck, this thread brought back bad memories of Jurassic Park 3.
 
The OBJECTS IN MIRROR ARE CLOSER THAN THEY APPEAR shot, is one of the most brilliant single shots in any film I have ever seen.
 
t-rex.jpg

Yes, cinematic gold right there.



Also, the first reaveal in this scene was practially perfect:
brach400.jpg

You where expecting it, you knew you where about to see a dinosaur right there, "on film", and you knew it woudl look good...

...Then came the cut.. and it looked freaking real. Not a model, not a special effect, there was a 60' dinosaur in that clearing.
That was the shot that (for me) crossed the line and demonstrated that GCI could truly be "photo-realistic", that you really could put *anything* into a film with a computer.

- Mikko
 
Last edited:
Also, the first reaveal in this scene was practially perfect:
brach400.jpg

You where expecting it, you knew you where about to see a dinosaur right there, "on film", and you knew it woudl look good...

...Then came the cut.. and it looked freaking real. Not a model, not a special effect, there was a 60' dinosaur in that clearing.
That was the shot that (for me) crossed the line and demonstrated that GCI could truly be "photo-realistic", that you really could put *anything* into a film with a computer.

- Mikko

And I still get the thrill every time I see that shot. It's a cinematically perfect moment.
 
this movie rocks...loved everything about it.

and the vfx have held up so well...more than 10 years later and the king kong dinos dont come close to looking as good.
 
...Then came the cut.. and it looked freaking real. Not a model, not a special effect, there was a 60' dinosaur in that clearing.
That was the shot that (for me) crossed the line and demonstrated that GCI could truly be "photo-realistic", that you really could put *anything* into a film with a computer.

- Mikko

Yes--anything! ;-)
 

Attachments

  • jarjarbinks.jpg
    jarjarbinks.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 0
  • jarjarbinks2.jpg
    jarjarbinks2.jpg
    101.1 KB · Views: 0
This movie blended ALL aspects incredibly well. I ate at the same restaurant (on Kauai) that the "covert meeting" was at and you wouldn't know it was the same place.
 
this movie rocks...loved everything about it.

and the vfx have held up so well...more than 10 years later and the king kong dinos dont come close to looking as good.

Personally, i feel that its the way that spielberg chose his shots that made the dinosaurs look more real - after all certain angles do accentuate the 3D renderings and just make them look more real?
 
Back
Top