El Director
Veteran
Leap: Revelation Lookbook
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
During the same scene as the big roof jump I did earlier in the week, there will be a shot from the traceurs view looking down as martial law begins. Had a "bright idea" today where if I could find a good soldier model, animate a walk cycle for it in Poser, then export the obj sequence for use in Element. To test this idea, I used one of the basic Poser models, James. I customized his shirt in Photoshop and spent all of 30 seconds generating a walk cycle. The obj sequence exported just fine too. By now I'm thinking I'm a genius and go to import the sequence into Element. Once it loads I realize I may have an issue - 280,000 vertices! Multiply it by forty and things start getting slower. This frame took five minutes and all it has is Element and a fast blur.
![]()
I wanted to see if the vertice count was the issue, so I grabed a low poly SWAT guy in a cool pose off the web. 8,000 vertices. This image below was spit out instantly and it even has a Colorista applied. The drawback is that there's no animation to it. So I need to find a low poly solider that will be easy to chain and apply a walk cycle to. I wonder if such a thing exists?
![]()
Do you mean render from Poser and comp them together? Or Do it in Element one figure at a time, render, then comp them? I may try the last one first. Great idea, thanks!I wonder if by only rendering the motion of one marcher, with about 10 'architype' variations, then mixing them up in a composite, with reusing the 'archetypes', would be faster... sure those people who single step through entire movies to catch all the 'gaffs' and then list them on IMDB would catch the 'trick'... but if the shot is a second or two, given modern editing practice, it may work out better. (What I'm think of is that 'Normandy Beach' FX video, where with a couple of guys on the beach, a relatively 'evenly lit' day, the composited images looked like an army landing...)
You know your own work as well as the message you want to get out.
That is basically what I'm looking at doing, but I want to pay the main actors a fair wage for fair work. My T2i now requires about 5 seconds of recording before I can introduce any motion into the scene, otherwise it buffers out. Not going to cut it on a movie like this. Unless I can raise a large enough budget to get a C300, I will be purchasing another Canon APS-C DSLR that can run Magic Lantern. Probably a T3i or 60D (not a fan of the touch screen on newer models). I want to stay with Canon because of Magic Lantern and the pictures styles I've adopted from VisionColor. I want to stay with APS-C to keep a more traditional film look, as the 5D line has a sensor that is larger than 35mm motion picture film, whereas and APS-C chip is almost the same size as motion 35mm.Maybe you just pay the main actors and give the others a small stipend. And what's wrong with T2i? It looked awesome in that video. Start working on it and gathering things together and it will fall into place. That's how I've worked and it hasn't failed me yet.
-Nate
As far as acting, due to the VFX, I really feel I should stay behind the camera, at least on this film. If I can't find someone to play the new male lead, then yes, I would consider it as I know a few camera guys I would consider trusting.One more thing, as far as actors go, honestly, it might be about that time for you to get in front of the camera. You know your own work as well as the message you want to get out. You know the moves and teach them to the others. You're young and have the look. You have to do like I did and wait until you're thirty. You're in your prime. Get a camera guy whose willing to work with you financially and shoot the thing. The music will come later and I guarantee you God will give you what you need when you need it to make a really great project. The rest is up to you.
-Nate