Terry_Lasater
All about the Caption
Re: KILLER WAVE??
[quote author=overlandfilms link=board=Offtopic;num=1104854189;start=15#18 date=01/04/05 at 14:01:49]Terry,
Don't get me wrong on the Killer Bees / tsunami quote - my point is that "KILLER WAVES" is not a scientific interpretation but fantastic, hyped graphic that sensationalizes the tragic events being reported.
Now, I certainly was stretching a bit on the 5 year old comment generalization - my own 6-year old didn't know the word until this week and she's no dummy.
[/quote]
Thanks for the clarification. I must admit, it was that line that drew my ire.
Well said. I agree with your comments. TV news reporting has definitely undergone major technological changes since the first Gulf War. There seems to be soooo much info out there that it's impossible to soak up everything and still live a life.
I hate that *every* news station *has* to have text scrolling across the lower third complete with accompanying graphics to feed our ADD tendencies. Even local news stations are getting in on the fun.
[quote author=overlandfilms link=board=Offtopic;num=1104854189;start=15#18 date=01/04/05 at 14:01:49]Terry,
Don't get me wrong on the Killer Bees / tsunami quote - my point is that "KILLER WAVES" is not a scientific interpretation but fantastic, hyped graphic that sensationalizes the tragic events being reported.
Now, I certainly was stretching a bit on the 5 year old comment generalization - my own 6-year old didn't know the word until this week and she's no dummy.
[/quote]
Thanks for the clarification. I must admit, it was that line that drew my ire.
Still, a 2" graphic KILLER WAVES made up of frame-grabbed flood footage on my 27" monitor proclaiming disaster certainly crosses some fact reporting ethical boundaries. The media is not always responsible for what happens in the world, and I certainly don't blame the media for a tsunami.
Now, I'm rarely in a position to dictate what anyone watches, but I do have the right as a US citizen to call foul when something crosses the line. I happen to think that television news reporting has eroded (in my lifetime) from feature story quality subject study into sensational propaganda and agenda pushing. We are quickly fed information through soundbites and music video length edits - and are expected or expect to be able to - form views and opinions based on this limited and strictly formatted material.
I do indeed think there is a problem and we can do better. This is why I take the time to read the NY Times; Washington Post; SF Gate and Christian Science Monitor throughout the week and have NPR or BBC WorldService droning on behind me as I work.
I don't proclaim to know anything about anything, but I do wish to be informed in a responsible way befitting someone who invests their time to be so.
What do you think?
Well said. I agree with your comments. TV news reporting has definitely undergone major technological changes since the first Gulf War. There seems to be soooo much info out there that it's impossible to soak up everything and still live a life.
I hate that *every* news station *has* to have text scrolling across the lower third complete with accompanying graphics to feed our ADD tendencies. Even local news stations are getting in on the fun.