Is there much difference between the Dvx100 and Hvx200 when using 35mm adapter??

Just wondering if there is a lot of difference between the two cameras when they're used with shallow 35mm lens'? I mean surely blur is blur, but on the other hand the sharpness is probably better.. I don't know, i'm in a situation where I'm looking at both, and because i'm predominately going to be shooting more abstract imagery, i'm wondering if I should go for the HVX or DVX.. (The work will end up on dvd/ be projected).. If anyone can give me any advice on this it would be helpfull...
 
DVX will be more sensitive to light, usually at least twice as sensitive. In 16:9 the HVX will be much sharper. Then you also have the options of HD and variable frame rates and all that, which the DVX doesn't have. But the DVX is half the price, so -- gotta decide which best meets your needs.
 
well, the hvx is HD and the dvx is SD. if you need HD - theres your answer.

but like barry says, the dvx performs better in low light
 
Back
Top