Harry Lime
Well-known member
Exposed in Slog at 800ISO, the thing is pretty noisy.
I'm going to have to disagree, but you're entitled to your opinion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exposed in Slog at 800ISO, the thing is pretty noisy.
What IDT do you use for original SLOG Harry?
Pix 240i is kinda pricey... I'd suggest the BMD Video Assist or Atomos Samurai Blade instead for only US$495. Makes it good match for a camera which now only costs US$1500ish to buy.
If I was to spend more for a recorder (I have the Samurai Blade), I'd go for the PIX-E5 instead (which I think would still be cheaper than a Pix 240i secondhand??? As Pix 240i prices on eBay seem very high).
I already own BMPCC and have owned BMCC 2.5k in the past. I'm done with Blackmagic. I don't want to deal with them anymore. I'd rather go with a used a7S mk1 for a gimbal camera at this point honestly.
Why no more Blackmagic?
You'd probably find an F35 to be double the hassle
I have a massive background with the F3 (and I'm selling one right now, btw) and the best bang for your buck that will outdo most everything else close to the price range is a Atomos Blade going into the single SDI on the F3 with S-log gamma turned on. You don't need an RGB update for that, or anything else. I use a 1TB drive and can roll on docs. for an entire day if I want to. No problems ever and the footage has massively blown away any other camera used on the docs, commercial and music video stuff I've done with it. Using an F35 in the same way would simply be impossible... battery issues, low light, mass, etc. etc... although nothing beats the F35 color and mojo but its not a *working* doc and all-arounder camera in any way at all. The F3 with the new Zacuto baseplate/shoulder rig is the best thing since sliced bread and makes it a real doc cam when you add an EVF. And people like to complain about the internal XDcam footage but test it yourself, it works and intercuts REALLY WELL and yes, even in slog.
The short answer would be, no. A baby F35 to me would be the F35 sensor in a smaller body.
The F3 doesn't look much like the F35, if at all. Not in color, not in motion and most definitely not in highlight management and image depth.
A F3 at current prices of 1.5-2K is the best cost/benefit ratio of any HD "video camera". But if what you need is a "digital film" camera, the F3 won't do for you what the F35 will. Which of course doesn't change the fact the F3 is a superb camera.
The reason I asked the question was simply because looking in old Sony promotions they put the F3 in the Cine Alta line and at the time that included the F35. In fact, in an old F3 ad it said that the F3 is part of the same family and was designed to be possibly even a B camera to the F35.
Very helpful Dr Wu. The reason I asked the question was simply because looking in old Sony promotions they put the F3 in the Cine Alta line and at the time that included the F35. In fact, in an old F3 ad it said that the F3 is part of the same family and was designed to be possibly even a B camera to the F35. The F3 clearly doesn't have the same image as F35, however it has a more similar look to it. At least to my eye. More so than their modern cameras do and more so than any other camera manufacturer I've seen. Also it seems to be the only camera in the 1.5-2k range that does 10bit 4444 ProRes that is in a professional video camera body with all the convenience of ND, long battery life, etc...