groveChuck
U-matic Member
I want my NBA!
I write this with one eye on NFL and one on the forum, World Series coming up (snoooore!) but I want my NBA, dammit!
I want the entertainment, I want the excitement.
I want the action, I want the athleticism.
I want the threes, the dunks and the fadeaways, the defense, the jukes and the soaring.
I want to forget about the economy, and think about the ecstatic energy of the NBA.
Yeah, I want the Heat to redeem themselves after the disappointing NBA Finals (hello again, all you Dallas fans from the Finals!), but I want the whole league- large market Knicks to small market Charlotte.
I want them to fix it.
Because this isn't a "lockout", it's the owners and players (both culpable) boycotting the fans.
I want my NBA.
Here's the Miami Herald's Greg Cote with a great perspective:
I write this with one eye on NFL and one on the forum, World Series coming up (snoooore!) but I want my NBA, dammit!
I want the entertainment, I want the excitement.
I want the action, I want the athleticism.
I want the threes, the dunks and the fadeaways, the defense, the jukes and the soaring.
I want to forget about the economy, and think about the ecstatic energy of the NBA.
Yeah, I want the Heat to redeem themselves after the disappointing NBA Finals (hello again, all you Dallas fans from the Finals!), but I want the whole league- large market Knicks to small market Charlotte.
I want them to fix it.
Because this isn't a "lockout", it's the owners and players (both culpable) boycotting the fans.
I want my NBA.
Here's the Miami Herald's Greg Cote with a great perspective:
There are no good guys in this NBA lockout. No victims, no sympathetic figures. Start there. The villains are everywhere. The villains are wearing suits and wingtips, and shorts and sneakers. The villains look like commissioners and team owners, and they look like forwards and point guards.
More galling than the self-defeating stalemate, you get the feeling both sides are oblivious to the fact theirs is the most spectacularly ill-timed sports labor dispute in history. Or maybe it’s just that the men of uncommon privilege involved in this mess are so financially well-off that relating to folks struggling down at the real-world level is impossible.
I wonder if commissioner David Stern and superstars like LeBron James have a clue that nobody out there in a badly limping U.S. economy wants to hear about self-entitled billionaire team owners and professionally pampered millionaire athletes in a room arguing over how to share $4.3 billion – with both sides so hell-bent on their own pockets that neither can bring itself to find the necessary compromise.
With joblessness over 9 percent nationally, how about Heat owner Micky Arison and star Dwyane Wade visit an unemployment office and try to explain their respective labor positions to an out-of-work welder who can’t feed his family.
The “Occupy Wall Street” movement blooms as an outlet of grass-roots frustration over the disparity in wealth distribution – what we used to call haves and have-nots – while the ultimate “haves” who are NBA owners and players boycott their own fans, in effect, because all that these rich men have evidently isn’t nearly enough.
The barons of sports get a free pass, come to think of it, when we consider the American caste system defined by wealth. We hold up to proper outrage the corporate CEOs who lavish themselves with exorbitant salaries and raises even as their companies fail and beg government bailouts. But how much less is the gulf between haves and have-nots in sports, when basketball players are making more money in one quarter of one game (yes, one quarter of one game) than many of their fans make in an entire year.
Fans being fans, we don’t begrudge our stars this lunatic chasm, even as we take out our second mortgages, obediently pay $30 to park outside the arena and wonder why a cup of beer has to cost $9. We don’t begrudge our stars when they are playing, at least, because they are of value then. They are some of our antidote to real life, the feel-good we count on, the diversion that is medicinal.
No loyalty?
It is when the games stop for no good reason or for what feels like avarice that we pause, and wonder if the loyalty that costs us so much is being returned.
It is fashionable and easy to paint Stern and club owners as the most wrong in a roomful of wrong here, but if Stern is right about the league-wide economic portrait – a net operating loss of $300 million and 22 of 30 clubs in the red last year – it is his responsibility to try and fix that.
A more independent voice, Forbes, reported the NBA had a net operating profit of $183 million last season but that 17 clubs lost money, and that the biggest bleeders were small-market Orlando, Indiana and Charlotte.
New model needed
By either numbers, one can see a new business model is needed. The owners in 2005 approved the very system they are now fighting to change, but times have changed.
The economic reality has.
If the existing system indeed has more than half the teams losing money, a different system is needed – along with a general acknowledgement that maybe giving an $118 million contract to Rashard Lewis wasn’t smart spending.
More than teams’ profitability, the NBA needs more of what the NFL enjoys: parity, and the ability of small markets (like Green Bay) to compete. Revenue sharing gets you closer to that.
So does either a hard salary cap or a more punitive “luxury tax” that discourages “have” owners from lording fatter wallets over their have-not brethren.
In canceling the first two weeks of the regular season Stern said this week, “We remain very, very far apart on virtually all issues.”
Season in trouble
That’s the-entire-season-is-in-jeopardy talk.
Somebody has to blink here, grownups.
A healthier NBA might require some reigning-in on player salaries, but rest assured no player would go hungry. That’s a promise.
LeBron and Chris Bosh both made $177,000 per game in Heat salary last season.
LeBron, with plenty of free time, sent a playful note to his Twitter followers this week asking when is the deadline for NFL teams to sign free agents, a sort of wink-wink that the former all-state wide receiver in high school might want to moonlight during the lockout.
Ah, the idle rich. Must be nice to be both idle and rich.
Poor D-Wade? He somehow got by on only $173,000 per game last season. And because each sacrificed so all three might be joined – the nobility – Miami’s Big 3 were not even on the top tier of NBA high salaries.
Plenty of players make more than $200,000 per game. And of course a superstar’s team income is augmented royally with endorsement dough from Nike, T-Mobile, etc.
That is why it’s such a hoot to hear analysts surmise that the players’ resolve to keep fighting may begin to fray when it gets to be Nov. 15 and the first of the bi-monthly team paychecks isn’t there.
Really? Seriously? You think Wade needs that check to make ends meet, do you? Figure LeBron might have to apply for food stamps? How about Bosh in a paper hat working the drive-through line at McDonald’s?
Rich athletes
Forget superstars. The average NBA player’s salary is $5.5 million a year, the highest average in any American team sport.
Players being asked to make a slight financial sacrifice from a starting point of extreme wealth for the good of their sport and league does not strike me as outrageous.
What is fairly outrageous is the NBA’s mega-rich continuing their penthouse stalemate over who gets how many millions when the people who want to be their fans are down there fighting through this economy and trying to pay bills.