i see a very good and inexpensive 2 mics plz tell me if it is

  • Thread starter Thread starter holysphinx1@hotmail.com
  • Start date Start date
H

holysphinx1@hotmail.com

Guest
i really spent on steadycam lenses and crane focus etc so i really dont have money for mics so ill spent from my flesh
here is one solution as i think its uhf and xlr "professional and " both mics in one

Audio2000 Awm-6032um UHF Dual Channel Wireless Microphone System with Two Lapel (Lavalier) Mic

link" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002L2 ... IFYALQ6V0O

so if this one fits i will be gratfull to god knoowing u have good shotgun and mid wirless system and low one "sony"
if this is a waist plz help me with suggestions i talked alot to describe my problem
"decent inexpensie lav wirless to complete my rig ill love u if u said the above audio2000 ia good lol lol"
 
Most of these low prized wireless systems are weak in both performance and built quality. I would try to get hold of a used Sennheiser G2/G3 system instead.
 
why weak any one knows will it fit for films
i have sen me 66 shotgun with ediroll r44 4chanels
and to weak sony wireless lav for 99 $each

so will this audio 2000 fit me or i stay renting 2 as i did b4
 
of course having mic better than renting i really work on low budget
 
any one used this mic or knows about it plz answer me
 
OK, let me try an analogy here. In your own words, you "really spent" on a lot of things, including a camera stabilizer. Your signature says you have a Glidecam 4000, which costs $380 on B&H. The general consensus of the more pro-level users on this forum is that the Sennheiser G3 is the "entry level" of pro wireless; a camera-mount system costs $600 on B&H, and that's before you replace the less-than-amazing ME2 lavalier mic with something better. The system you linked to costs $116, and is dual system, so it works out to be about 10% of the cost of buying two G3's. So, if you found a camera stabilizer that was 10% of the cost of the Glidecam at $38, would you think that it was equal quality?

I don't see how this could even be as good as your "weak" Sony systems, so I would say stick with them for now and keep saving for something better.

As a sidebar, I was actually kind of surprised by the number of good reviews this has, until I read a couple and realized that the reviewers had no idea what they were talking about. :)
 
holysphinx1@hotmail.com said:
i really spent on steadycam lenses and crane focus etc so i really dont have money for mics so ill spent from my flesh
here is one solution as i think its uhf and xlr "professional and " both mics in one

Audio2000 Awm-6032um UHF Dual Channel Wireless Microphone System with Two Lapel (Lavalier) Mic

link" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002L2 ... IFYALQ6V0O

so if this one fits i will be gratfull to god knoowing u have good shotgun and mid wirless system and low one "sony"
if this is a waist plz help me with suggestions i talked alot to describe my problem
"decent inexpensie lav wirless to complete my rig ill love u if u said the above audio2000 ia good lol lol"
Click to expand...

It's really unsuitable for video work.

It's a very cheap system designed for small country churches or village halls and the like, as far as I can see.

The receiver needs mains and is too large to attach to a camera.

The Sennheiser ew 100 ENG G3 or the ew 112p G3 really should be the entry-level standard and not go cheaper than this.

The "rule of thumb" is that you should spend the same amount of money on the audio side as you do on the video side (maybe more).
 
thx all for u r reply and u r help i really know that i spent alot on picture
but really am in very tight budget for my gear actually no budget ill pay from my own blood and flesh
so what is the best cheapest mic that i cant go down it for my film production as u see
and for mounting the reciever to my cam i never do its all mounted beside ediroll r-44 4chanels operator so it doesnt mind for me
but thats another thing if it is low quality then no use
thx really for all u r time and effort
 
You really should read through the Audio 101 sticky at the top of the Audio forum. Honestly, there's a minimum investment of $500-600 USD to get a decent wireless system. If you cannot afford to buy, rent. Wireless rental isn't hard to find in the States, though I have no personal experience with rentals in Cairo. You said you've been renting in the past, so I assume it's something you can continue to do.
 
what if i could get some one like this and may be i find used do u think it will fit my films
 
what if i could get some one like this and may be i find used do u think it will fit my film


Azden




[h=2]105LT 105 Series UHF Wireless Microphone System with 15BT Transmitter[/h]
 
holysphinx1@hotmail.com said:
thx all for u r reply and u r help i really know that i spent alot on picture
but really am in very tight budget for my gear actually no budget ill pay from my own blood and flesh
so what is the best cheapest mic that i cant go down it for my film production as u see
and for mounting the reciever to my cam i never do its all mounted beside ediroll r-44 4chanels operator so it doesnt mind for me
but thats another thing if it is low quality then no use
thx really for all u r time and effort
Click to expand...

I answered this question HERE.
 
You will not get a wireless kit of acceptable quality under $500-600 a channel. Period.

The hours you're spending on Amazon trying to find a bargain are hours that could better be spent earning more cash to rent or buy gear that is not a complete waste of money.
 
ok ok let me try to ask another question

is it a must to have wireless lav for shooting films for years in egyptian cinema,great movies just used a shotgun and maximum lav wired mic hided in some corner
is there any other posibilites
 
The best solution for you right now would be to hire a sound person that knows the gear and knows what they are doing. Preferably someone who owns their gear. You'll have to pay them, of course, but if you hire someone that is good, you will not need to micromanage so much, especially in an area that you seem to know very little about.
 
holysphinx1@hotmail.com said:
ok ok let me try to ask another question

is it a must to have wireless lav for shooting films for years in egyptian cinema,great movies just used a shotgun and maximum lav wired mic hided in some corner
is there any other posibilites
Click to expand...

It really depends on your script, the nature of the action, and the blocking of your scenes. A boom or a wired lav hidden on the set would be just fine for two spies whispering plans to each other over a small table in a cafe but not at all appropriate for two cowboys on horseback riding side-by-side down the trail talking to each other.
 
1) I don't see the specification for frequency range on that page anywhere. That is the very definition of a "pig in a poke". The frequency range/band is a critical issue especially in larger population areas. And, of course, if it is anywhere in the 700MHz band, it is just plain illegal to use in the USA. I would rule out that product on this basis alone.
2) The microphones themselves are likely very low quality. That means that they will probably be more sensitive to mechanical (rubbing, etc.) noise. They will likely have higher "self-noise", they will have lower sensitivity, and they won't be rugged enough to withstand the kind of abuse you typically see when shooting out on location with non-technical people like "actors" and other species colloquially known as "talent". So it will be more difficult to get a good placement, get a good signal, and keep them operating out in the real world.
3) The transmitters likely have low-end circuitry which may have no companding or other means of enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio. And we don't know if the system is "frequency-agile" which means that you can change frequency depending on local interference conditions. That means they will likely have the sound artifacts of cheap wireless systems. That is if you can actually use the system and avoid local interference.
4) The receiver likely has none of the sensitivity or selectivity seen in systems that are found to be acceptable for professional (or even "prosumer") use. That means it will be more susceptible to interruption of the signal from the transmitter, as well as more susceptible to interference from local sources.

That unit is around 1/10th the price of the MINIMUM acceptable wireless mic units. How would you feel buying " steadycam lenses and crane focus" components at 1/10th what you spent?

Many people here have a decaying cardboard box in the basement/attic/garage with a pile of old, cheap, unreliable, fiddly, toy plastic wireless gadgets like this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top