With all of the talk about the Hyperdeck Shuttle recently in this forum, it's got me thinking about the Shuttle as an alternative to the Gemini.
My question is: if one is planning to work with uncompressed files, what do you get for the extra cost of the Gemini? This is a real question and I'm not trying to start a flame war here, just looking for facts.
Specifically:
- Can you transcode directly from the Hyperdeck files (wrapped as .mov I believe) into to your favorite format using Adobe Media Encoder? I know you can do that with Gemini as I have done it successfully on some test files.
If you can, then you should be able to get equally high quality images from both at 422 (not 444 of course!)
Both I believe are low volts and can be powered easily with external battery.
Aside from that, Gemini gives you:
- Monitor
- LUTs
- 444/RGB*
*I'm not convinced I can see a difference between 422 and 444, but does the RGB output into the Gemini add anything?
Anything else I'm missing in factoring in the benefits vs. costs?
Thanks.
My question is: if one is planning to work with uncompressed files, what do you get for the extra cost of the Gemini? This is a real question and I'm not trying to start a flame war here, just looking for facts.
Specifically:
- Can you transcode directly from the Hyperdeck files (wrapped as .mov I believe) into to your favorite format using Adobe Media Encoder? I know you can do that with Gemini as I have done it successfully on some test files.
If you can, then you should be able to get equally high quality images from both at 422 (not 444 of course!)
Both I believe are low volts and can be powered easily with external battery.
Aside from that, Gemini gives you:
- Monitor
- LUTs
- 444/RGB*
*I'm not convinced I can see a difference between 422 and 444, but does the RGB output into the Gemini add anything?
Anything else I'm missing in factoring in the benefits vs. costs?
Thanks.