I have an HVX200 and I'm considering getting a second camera to use for two camera direct to DVD or internet TV shows. In other words, high quality looks on a low production budget but not delivered for the big screen.
I understand that the new HVX200A is about 1/2 stop better with light sensitivity and also produces less grain.
-Would it require taking extra steps while editing in Final Cut Pro 6 (or any editing software!) to match the 720p footage from the HVX200 and the newer A version camera? In other words, if the lighting had been low enough for some shots, might the exposure and grain on the HVX200 shots be more noticeable and not match when compared with the HVX200A shots? Also, would there be a noticeable difference between the two with adequately lit shots?
-Are there any savable settings on the new HVX200A, perhaps on SD card that would match the light sensitivity and grain characteristics of the HVX200?
-Would shooting and editing be easier with two HVX200 instead?
Thanks! :laugh:
I understand that the new HVX200A is about 1/2 stop better with light sensitivity and also produces less grain.
-Would it require taking extra steps while editing in Final Cut Pro 6 (or any editing software!) to match the 720p footage from the HVX200 and the newer A version camera? In other words, if the lighting had been low enough for some shots, might the exposure and grain on the HVX200 shots be more noticeable and not match when compared with the HVX200A shots? Also, would there be a noticeable difference between the two with adequately lit shots?
-Are there any savable settings on the new HVX200A, perhaps on SD card that would match the light sensitivity and grain characteristics of the HVX200?
-Would shooting and editing be easier with two HVX200 instead?
Thanks! :laugh: