DC
Cinematographiliac
Just thought I'd rant about this for a minute . . .
I was in an unnamed, DVXUser-friendly gear shop today in the LA-area when I overheard a conversation. It involved two fimmakers that were debating which camera to buy: a DVX100B or an HVX200. The sales guy was trying to help them decide. At first he was trying to talk them into buying a Canon and then finally a DVX (when they seemed more insistent on Panasonic).
Ok, fine . . . but he mentioned some things about the HVX that were really off-the-mark. I'll paraphrase approximately what I heard:
"In this price range, it's the camera that comes closest to true HD."
"The colors aren't very good when it comes to looking like film. Look at the built-in LCD . . . see what I mean?"
"The picture looks too real. Better for live events."
:huh:
He went on to say other incorrect or unfair statements. The filmmakers were like, "Wow, yeah, that's terrible. We keep hearing so many bad things about the HVX."
Around then, I interjected a bit to try to clarify a few things. Then I went right back to my business because I was in a bit of a rush. Then the sales guy came over and asked to borrow my "expertise." So, I spent a few minutes trying to explain to them the merits of the HVX and how it might work well for their project and future projects. I gave one of the filmmaker's a business card and told her to call/email me if she had any HVX questions and I would be glad to help. I also recommended Barry's book. I may have swayed her on an HVX - I dunno.
Anyway, the point is that it is somewhat frustrating to hear anybody misinforming a potential HVX customer. Don't get me wrong - I don't think the sales rep was purposely trying to be deceitful or what not. He seemed like a really nice guy. So nothing personal here. All I'm saying is that I wish people - filmmakers and sales people alike - were spreading more accurate information about the HVX.
For whatever reason, this camera still seems to be like an Edsel to many, and a mystery at best. Personally, I love the HVX. It has been a great camera for all my needs. I think the pro's far outweigh whatever con's are brought up. The HVX has been out for nearly one year, and while I think Panasonic has done a fantastic job promoting it, I think they need to do even more to educate the community.
I was in an unnamed, DVXUser-friendly gear shop today in the LA-area when I overheard a conversation. It involved two fimmakers that were debating which camera to buy: a DVX100B or an HVX200. The sales guy was trying to help them decide. At first he was trying to talk them into buying a Canon and then finally a DVX (when they seemed more insistent on Panasonic).
Ok, fine . . . but he mentioned some things about the HVX that were really off-the-mark. I'll paraphrase approximately what I heard:
"In this price range, it's the camera that comes closest to true HD."
"The colors aren't very good when it comes to looking like film. Look at the built-in LCD . . . see what I mean?"
"The picture looks too real. Better for live events."
:huh:
He went on to say other incorrect or unfair statements. The filmmakers were like, "Wow, yeah, that's terrible. We keep hearing so many bad things about the HVX."
Around then, I interjected a bit to try to clarify a few things. Then I went right back to my business because I was in a bit of a rush. Then the sales guy came over and asked to borrow my "expertise." So, I spent a few minutes trying to explain to them the merits of the HVX and how it might work well for their project and future projects. I gave one of the filmmaker's a business card and told her to call/email me if she had any HVX questions and I would be glad to help. I also recommended Barry's book. I may have swayed her on an HVX - I dunno.
Anyway, the point is that it is somewhat frustrating to hear anybody misinforming a potential HVX customer. Don't get me wrong - I don't think the sales rep was purposely trying to be deceitful or what not. He seemed like a really nice guy. So nothing personal here. All I'm saying is that I wish people - filmmakers and sales people alike - were spreading more accurate information about the HVX.
For whatever reason, this camera still seems to be like an Edsel to many, and a mystery at best. Personally, I love the HVX. It has been a great camera for all my needs. I think the pro's far outweigh whatever con's are brought up. The HVX has been out for nearly one year, and while I think Panasonic has done a fantastic job promoting it, I think they need to do even more to educate the community.
Last edited: