How important is reference audio?

Z

Zander Burstein

Member
Running a cable to camera isn't always easy, and I don't have a wireless hop!

I'd love to hear some post insight on the importance of a reference track.
 
and how important is dead-on sync to you (or more importantly, to the clients or audience who are expecting you to deliver professional quality work?) No one said the job was easy but you have to be willing to do whatever it takes to deliver state-of-the-art performance.
 
But with a proper slate, it isn't a huge deal... and as long as there's a mic on the camera, you have at least a very rudimentary reference track.
 
Alex H. said:
But with a proper slate, it isn't a huge deal...
Click to expand...

They've been doing it that way with film for over 80 years - and still do it that way. Sometimes it's amazing how lazy and spoiled we have become with all of the work-saving technology available to us.

My wife is a graphic artist and can remember when you literally had to cut with a razor blade and paste with adhesive. As a photographer she also developed her own B&W film. I remember when the studio where I recorded went from eight to 16 tracks.
 
unclebob6958 said:
They've been doing it that way with film for over 80 years - and still do it that way. Sometimes it's amazing how lazy and spoiled we have become with all of the work-saving technology available to us.

My wife is a graphic artist and can remember when you literally had to cut with a razor blade and paste with adhesive. As a photographer she also developed her own B&W film. I remember when the studio where I recorded went from eight to 16 tracks.
Click to expand...


We still don't use any of that plural eyes, duals eyes, etc... stuff. Having the reference audio waveform there just shaves that syncing to the slate down from 30 seconds to 20 seconds because you can get it close by just eyeballing the wave forms.
 
Alex H. said:
But with a proper slate, it isn't a huge deal... and as long as there's a mic on the camera, you have at least a very rudimentary reference track.
Click to expand...

So to be specific the the question it is useful to important to have some reference track married to the video. A slate will get you sync at the head and your drift should not be significant if your takes are in the less than ten min. range.

The reference track is important when you have problems and are trying to sync with a bad slate or after you have made some cuts and sync has slipped because of some silly user error. It's a really nice safety net but it is not necessary IF you have followed a strict old school slating and documenting workflow.
 
Noiz2 said:
A slate will get you sync at the head and your drift should not be significant if your takes are in the less than ten min. range.
Click to expand...

If you're worried about drift, just capture a tail slate -- easy enough if you're already doing the head slate.
 
AtticusLake said:
If you're worried about drift, just capture a tail slate -- easy enough if you're already doing the head slate.
Click to expand...

Tail slates are often far from easy - itchy trigger fingers always hit the switch too soon. I've missed hundreds of tail slates in my career.
 
nothing said:
Tail slates are often far from easy - itchy trigger fingers always hit the switch too soon. I've missed hundreds of tail slates in my career.
Click to expand...

And it doesn't fix the sync just lets you know you are off. With some math you can get in the ballpark of the shrink/stretch you need on the take BUT that is only if the drift is constant.

My vote, you still want a reference if at all possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top