k2director
Well-known member
I'm thinking of getting an HPX500, but have a question I was hoping someone could help me with.
I currently have an HVX200, and use it for short docs and corporate videos. My shooting consists of talking head interviews (tripod), and then B roll showing things the subject is talking about (for instance, machinery in a lab, horses on a farm, etc) , which I shoot either handheld or on a tripod. For all this, I've largely gotten away with using the camera's auto-focus system, and the built-in LCD screen.
Now I'm thinking of going to the HPX500 (to gain the narrower depth of field for interviews, the better sensitivity, and the shoulder-mount), but I was surprised to learn it doesn't have an auto-focus. Combine that with the fact that the viewfinder is SD and black&white (which I find harder to discern details vs. a color viewfinder), and I'm wondering if I'm going to have a real challenge simply keeping things in focus for quick run-and-gun shots.
I know there's a focus assist, but I guess I'm a little intimidated about constantly having to focus the camera when I'm following a moving object, or pointing the camera in another direction.
So my question is (finally!):
Does manually focusing the camera all the time tend to slow you guys down, or is it something you get used to after while, and don't even think about because it becomes so natural and familiar? I've moved up from prosumer cameras (not down from broadcast cameras) so this idea of no auto-focus is a little daunting.
Anyway I've been thinking about the HPX for a long while, but this is the one issue that scares me. When I think about the Sony EX1, which has a color, super sharp viewfinder (so I can really see what I'm doing), and an auto-focus system for when I need it....well, it makes me think twice.
Any help much appreciated, thanks!
I currently have an HVX200, and use it for short docs and corporate videos. My shooting consists of talking head interviews (tripod), and then B roll showing things the subject is talking about (for instance, machinery in a lab, horses on a farm, etc) , which I shoot either handheld or on a tripod. For all this, I've largely gotten away with using the camera's auto-focus system, and the built-in LCD screen.
Now I'm thinking of going to the HPX500 (to gain the narrower depth of field for interviews, the better sensitivity, and the shoulder-mount), but I was surprised to learn it doesn't have an auto-focus. Combine that with the fact that the viewfinder is SD and black&white (which I find harder to discern details vs. a color viewfinder), and I'm wondering if I'm going to have a real challenge simply keeping things in focus for quick run-and-gun shots.
I know there's a focus assist, but I guess I'm a little intimidated about constantly having to focus the camera when I'm following a moving object, or pointing the camera in another direction.
So my question is (finally!):
Does manually focusing the camera all the time tend to slow you guys down, or is it something you get used to after while, and don't even think about because it becomes so natural and familiar? I've moved up from prosumer cameras (not down from broadcast cameras) so this idea of no auto-focus is a little daunting.
Anyway I've been thinking about the HPX for a long while, but this is the one issue that scares me. When I think about the Sony EX1, which has a color, super sharp viewfinder (so I can really see what I'm doing), and an auto-focus system for when I need it....well, it makes me think twice.
Any help much appreciated, thanks!