I know that the HPX170's 4:2:2 vs HMC150's 4:2:0 makes the HPX170 better for for compositing/greenscreen/heavy grading (though I guess it's somewhat debatable). Are there any other major reasons beside better/smoother edge definition? What happens to 4:2:0 vs. 4:2:2 during extreme grading?
Can anyone pseudo-quantify how much worse HMC150 4:2:0 with chroma smoothing vs. HPX170 4:2:2 is for green screen? Aka, will the HMC150 get me 95% of the way there, but leave me no way to get a clean key when blown up? Does anyone have any horror stories about how difficult 4:2:0 made their lives for greenscreen/grading but how 4:2:2 saved the day?
My assumption is that HMC150 is "ok" for compositing/greenscreen/heavy grading, while the HPX170 is "pretty good".
Some of my projects will invovle some high motion greenscreen sequences, however, delivery will primarily be HD web streams and DVD. For me, cost is a factor, so I'm still heavily debating between the HMC150 and the HPX170.
Can anyone pseudo-quantify how much worse HMC150 4:2:0 with chroma smoothing vs. HPX170 4:2:2 is for green screen? Aka, will the HMC150 get me 95% of the way there, but leave me no way to get a clean key when blown up? Does anyone have any horror stories about how difficult 4:2:0 made their lives for greenscreen/grading but how 4:2:2 saved the day?
My assumption is that HMC150 is "ok" for compositing/greenscreen/heavy grading, while the HPX170 is "pretty good".
Some of my projects will invovle some high motion greenscreen sequences, however, delivery will primarily be HD web streams and DVD. For me, cost is a factor, so I'm still heavily debating between the HMC150 and the HPX170.