Hi folks,
I'm hoping someone with familiarity with the HMC-150 and the HPX-170 can share with me their thoughts. I originally had my eyes on the HPX-170 for short films, music videos, commercials and even features. But at 1/2 the cost, the HMC-150 is tempting. Can someone speak to how the image stands up when blown up to a large size, as it would be at a film festival? Also, do people think this is up to broadcast quality? (ie. if I shot a television pilot on it, would it be rejected on a quality basis?)
Any help with HPX-170 vs. HMC-150 in terms of these quality issues is appreciated. Basically, if my aim is a professional image, would I be smart to go with the HPX-170 instead? Is that basically the bottom of the "professional accepted cameras," or does the HMC-150 fit in there as well?
thanks!
keegan
I'm hoping someone with familiarity with the HMC-150 and the HPX-170 can share with me their thoughts. I originally had my eyes on the HPX-170 for short films, music videos, commercials and even features. But at 1/2 the cost, the HMC-150 is tempting. Can someone speak to how the image stands up when blown up to a large size, as it would be at a film festival? Also, do people think this is up to broadcast quality? (ie. if I shot a television pilot on it, would it be rejected on a quality basis?)
Any help with HPX-170 vs. HMC-150 in terms of these quality issues is appreciated. Basically, if my aim is a professional image, would I be smart to go with the HPX-170 instead? Is that basically the bottom of the "professional accepted cameras," or does the HMC-150 fit in there as well?
thanks!
keegan