Like many other first-time posters, I've been studying -- I mean really studying -- this forum for the the better part of a month.
I have made-up my mind and changed it about 50 times. My wife is starting to get concerned that I am spending so much time doing research on which camera to get.
I was hoping to get some last minute advice/thoughts from the incredible forum members here on which camera might suit my needs the most.
Here is my situation:
Current Equipment/Experience
1. Canon XL1 (DV)
2. Film SLR and digital point-and-shoot
3. Editing on Mac (FCP/imovie) and PC (Vegas) (editing is my forte, but I love being behind the camera, too)
So am I a pro? -- Not hardly. But, I have all the signs of one in the making.
What I am looking to shoot/requirements:
1. Every year, I film parts of a high-school musical (including rehearsals and tech/dress rehearsals) for a 15-20 minute compilation using video and stills. This year, I'd like to stretch it out to a 45-60 minute documentary-style film (i.e. a 'making-of' type documentary).
2. I would like to start producing wedding/event compilations like I've seen on Vimeo (not necessarily event filming -- at least not yet -- but 5-7 minute comps). Also, I am looking into video-resume production (future).
3. I would like to film some creative off-the-cuff stuff that may include keying, grading, and special effects (i.e. from After Effects or Motion).
4. Finally, something I can take with me on a cruise or other road-trip to shoot candids/family suff (basically -- something I can lock in a hard-case around the size of a carry-on bag).
My considerations:
1. Canon 7D -- Definitely wins on the portability factor, seems to shoot pleasing-to-the-non-critical-eye video (even with the aliasing and RS/Jello), stills capability (just one camera to carry), DOF, and 'stealth'. The cons are well documented, so I don't need to spit them back out here. Approximate cost of this solution (using B&H): 3030.75 (Canon 7D body, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM with hood and filter kit, 2 16GB UDMA Sandisk CF cards, and a lens case for the almost-L glass).
2. HMC150 -- close to the same price as the 7D package --- a little bit more when you throw in the lockable HMC150 case for transport and decent (i.e. Sandisk Extreme III) SDHC cards (Best price for package ~3800 (includes the HMC, 2 16GB SDHC cards, and one hard storage case)). My BIGGEST concern with the 150 (besides the codec and the easy-to-live-without-but-nice interval recording of the 40 and the 170) is the reliability of shooting to SDHC. It has only taken a couple of weeks of reading through the 150 section and hearing about the "CHECK CARD" errors to scare me enough to consider the jump to P2. Are we just hearing the few amongst the many who have had issues? I would hate (in any shooting situation) to lose footage -- this is important to me. If the SD card issue hadn't given me pause, I'd probably be playing with either a 7D or 150 at this point.
3. HPX170 -- OK...the high end (for me and my budget). When I first started my research, I immediately ruled out the 170 due to its higher cost and the cost of P2 media. However, after tons of research, it seemed that the 170 was getting closer to meeting all the needs I had identified. With the 500 rebate taken into consideration, the price of the 170 is only about 1100 more than the 150 (I know...ONLY 1100 lol). When you add a 64GB P2 card (and factor in good memory for the 150), the price difference stabilizes at about 1500. (Unfortunately, the case options don't seem as good for the 170 as there is no blue case made just for it (like the 150). The best option I could find was from Zacuto at ~300 (case + foam insert)). Of course, the DVCProHD format is reportedly easier to deal with than AVCHD - although I do not state that as fact (just from what Jan has said when comparing the HMC to the HPX) as I have no direct experience with DVCPro codecs. Also, I'm convinced that the HPX will do a better job (all things equal) with keying than the 150 due to the color sampling [and probably the 7D, as well].
The 150 and 170 are quite a bit larger than a 7D, but it still seems reasonable to walk around with one on vacation (any thoughts here?). Also, some have pointed-out the lack of sharpness (compared to the DSLRs) of the HMC and HPX. However, I really like the look of both the HMC and HPX. There is, in my opinion, such a thing as too much sharpness when you are shooting people (landscapes are another thing completely -- but even the landscape footage I've watched from the HMC/HPX looks great to me).
So, to summarize, the 7D and 150 are similar in cost. The theater shooting I do makes the choice harder for me. I could see the 7D for low-light handling and better DOF, but the 150 for handling motion better (CCD's). Typically, the actors are lit by pro-level stage lighting (we have an incredibly connected director) and I am either filming from on-stage or from the first few rows.
If the 150 is really the better choice vs the 7D (even if I can get over the CHECK CARD fear), am I just stupid for not going to the HPX170/P2 workflow (and 4:2:2 color) for ~1500 more?
I would really appreciate any advice/thoughts you might have (I have been drinking from the fire-hose for the last few weeks -- who ever thought I would be able to accurately explain the differences between 4:2:0 and 4:2:2 color sampling?).
One thing I am 100% positive about, though.....and that is that no matter what I choose, something with better specs and a cheaper price tag will be released within a few days.
Seriously.....
But, I want to get something and get out there!
Thanks again for your assistance and I apologize for the long post. I can only promise to help others once I've made my choice and have some time under my belt.
Peace,
Don
P.S. Thanks to everyone here (especially Barry Green) for participating in such a great forum! I cannot tell you how much I've learned just from reading though the articles and posts. The amount of information contained here is just amazing.
I have made-up my mind and changed it about 50 times. My wife is starting to get concerned that I am spending so much time doing research on which camera to get.
I was hoping to get some last minute advice/thoughts from the incredible forum members here on which camera might suit my needs the most.
Here is my situation:
Current Equipment/Experience
1. Canon XL1 (DV)
2. Film SLR and digital point-and-shoot
3. Editing on Mac (FCP/imovie) and PC (Vegas) (editing is my forte, but I love being behind the camera, too)
So am I a pro? -- Not hardly. But, I have all the signs of one in the making.
What I am looking to shoot/requirements:
1. Every year, I film parts of a high-school musical (including rehearsals and tech/dress rehearsals) for a 15-20 minute compilation using video and stills. This year, I'd like to stretch it out to a 45-60 minute documentary-style film (i.e. a 'making-of' type documentary).
2. I would like to start producing wedding/event compilations like I've seen on Vimeo (not necessarily event filming -- at least not yet -- but 5-7 minute comps). Also, I am looking into video-resume production (future).
3. I would like to film some creative off-the-cuff stuff that may include keying, grading, and special effects (i.e. from After Effects or Motion).
4. Finally, something I can take with me on a cruise or other road-trip to shoot candids/family suff (basically -- something I can lock in a hard-case around the size of a carry-on bag).
My considerations:
1. Canon 7D -- Definitely wins on the portability factor, seems to shoot pleasing-to-the-non-critical-eye video (even with the aliasing and RS/Jello), stills capability (just one camera to carry), DOF, and 'stealth'. The cons are well documented, so I don't need to spit them back out here. Approximate cost of this solution (using B&H): 3030.75 (Canon 7D body, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM with hood and filter kit, 2 16GB UDMA Sandisk CF cards, and a lens case for the almost-L glass).
2. HMC150 -- close to the same price as the 7D package --- a little bit more when you throw in the lockable HMC150 case for transport and decent (i.e. Sandisk Extreme III) SDHC cards (Best price for package ~3800 (includes the HMC, 2 16GB SDHC cards, and one hard storage case)). My BIGGEST concern with the 150 (besides the codec and the easy-to-live-without-but-nice interval recording of the 40 and the 170) is the reliability of shooting to SDHC. It has only taken a couple of weeks of reading through the 150 section and hearing about the "CHECK CARD" errors to scare me enough to consider the jump to P2. Are we just hearing the few amongst the many who have had issues? I would hate (in any shooting situation) to lose footage -- this is important to me. If the SD card issue hadn't given me pause, I'd probably be playing with either a 7D or 150 at this point.
3. HPX170 -- OK...the high end (for me and my budget). When I first started my research, I immediately ruled out the 170 due to its higher cost and the cost of P2 media. However, after tons of research, it seemed that the 170 was getting closer to meeting all the needs I had identified. With the 500 rebate taken into consideration, the price of the 170 is only about 1100 more than the 150 (I know...ONLY 1100 lol). When you add a 64GB P2 card (and factor in good memory for the 150), the price difference stabilizes at about 1500. (Unfortunately, the case options don't seem as good for the 170 as there is no blue case made just for it (like the 150). The best option I could find was from Zacuto at ~300 (case + foam insert)). Of course, the DVCProHD format is reportedly easier to deal with than AVCHD - although I do not state that as fact (just from what Jan has said when comparing the HMC to the HPX) as I have no direct experience with DVCPro codecs. Also, I'm convinced that the HPX will do a better job (all things equal) with keying than the 150 due to the color sampling [and probably the 7D, as well].
The 150 and 170 are quite a bit larger than a 7D, but it still seems reasonable to walk around with one on vacation (any thoughts here?). Also, some have pointed-out the lack of sharpness (compared to the DSLRs) of the HMC and HPX. However, I really like the look of both the HMC and HPX. There is, in my opinion, such a thing as too much sharpness when you are shooting people (landscapes are another thing completely -- but even the landscape footage I've watched from the HMC/HPX looks great to me).
So, to summarize, the 7D and 150 are similar in cost. The theater shooting I do makes the choice harder for me. I could see the 7D for low-light handling and better DOF, but the 150 for handling motion better (CCD's). Typically, the actors are lit by pro-level stage lighting (we have an incredibly connected director) and I am either filming from on-stage or from the first few rows.
If the 150 is really the better choice vs the 7D (even if I can get over the CHECK CARD fear), am I just stupid for not going to the HPX170/P2 workflow (and 4:2:2 color) for ~1500 more?
I would really appreciate any advice/thoughts you might have (I have been drinking from the fire-hose for the last few weeks -- who ever thought I would be able to accurately explain the differences between 4:2:0 and 4:2:2 color sampling?).
One thing I am 100% positive about, though.....and that is that no matter what I choose, something with better specs and a cheaper price tag will be released within a few days.
But, I want to get something and get out there!
Thanks again for your assistance and I apologize for the long post. I can only promise to help others once I've made my choice and have some time under my belt.
Peace,
Don
P.S. Thanks to everyone here (especially Barry Green) for participating in such a great forum! I cannot tell you how much I've learned just from reading though the articles and posts. The amount of information contained here is just amazing.
Last edited: