Has anyone tested a SD lens on the HPX500?

Hey hunter, just for "S&G", since you have that lens and a HD lens, do you mind posting some almost identical footage comparing the 2 lenses when you have some time? It would be really nice to once and for all see the exact difference, kinda like an A/B comparison.
 
I will have the same res chart photographed. I just sold my HD lens so I cant shoot the same scenes. Pictures from both look good and I dont think anyone could tell the difference.
 
I just got my j8x6, there is seriously no noticeable breathing at any focal length. I will post some grabs when I go to the office.(my computer is there)
 
Hey kaku, did you ever get any more grabs? It would be cool to post a few of your things over here on DVX...

Hunter, looking forward to it....
Kit
 
Oh snap! Grabs from 3 different wide-angle lenses on the Hpx500. (all lenses are at their maximum wide angle)

The first is an SD lens (the j8x6) You can buy this lens used for around $4-6K
1201746427.jpeg


Here is the new fujinon HD lens (HA13x4.5) like the action? This lens costs more than $20k with a doubler.
1201746880.jpeg


Here is a canon HD lens (HJ9x5.5) You can buy this lens used for around $12-16k
1201746649.jpeg



Please take that the HPX500 is not the best camera for high-frequency detail that exists in wide shots. (and it doesnt help that I set mine up to be softer on purpose) The HPX performs best in medium and tight applications (imo)

But can really see any difference?I think there is a bunch of BS being fed to cameramen about "HD" lenses. You can take these pictures for what it worth.

Oh yeah and all of the lenses had a proper back focus, and I still plan on shooting res charts soon.
 
I've been busy shooting with Brevis, and my SD lens doesn't allow putting Brevis, so what I've been posting are clips with Fujinon HD lens/Brevis combination.
 
I'm reading this thread as an HVX owner looking to add an HPX500, so, is it safe to say that an HPX500 with SD glass will far exceed the HVX?

I have to assume the HVX uses very cheap glass just based on the price point of the camera.

I am in need of a 2nd camera and getting into an HPX500 at the SD glass price point would make more sense than buying another HVX.
 
NeverColdCall said:
I'm reading this thread as an HVX owner looking to add an HPX500, so, is it safe to say that an HPX500 with SD glass will far exceed the HVX?

I have to assume the HVX uses very cheap glass just based on the price point of the camera.

I am in need of a 2nd camera and getting into an HPX500 at the SD glass price point would make more sense than buying another HVX.
Click to expand...

That was the full intention of this thread, to show that you don't have to spend $20k + to get into a nice camera.

Yes, the HPX500 with SD glasss will still outperform the 200. The low-light capabilities, interchangeable lenses, added pixel count and looking professional are very worth it. Not to mention all of the other advantages.
 
Last edited:
Kit Hannah said:
Yes, the HPX500 with SD glasss will still outperform the 200. The low-light capabilities, interchangeable lenses, added pixel count and looking professional are very worth it. Not to mention all of the other advantages.
Click to expand...

Nice, that makes it a no-brainer for me!
 
My HPX500 is on the UPS airplane to Switzerland right now. On monday, I will be a proud owner of this baby!
Beautiful HD times to come.

Peter
 
augenblick said:
My HPX500 is on the UPS airplane to Switzerland right now. On monday, I will be a proud owner of this baby!
Beautiful HD times to come.

Peter
Click to expand...

Hey Peter,

What lens will you be using with your 500? Could you post some full size frame grabs online and link to them? Let us know what you are using and the current settings.
Thanks
 
I plan to use the Letus Extreme with to soon to be released relay lens. Quyen Le told me on the phone that it'll be ready in about two weeks from now. Until then I rent a lens. No idea which model yet.

But I'll post pictures asap.

Peter
 
Last edited:
My HPX500 arrived on monday. :thumbsup:

A friend of mine gave me a lens I can use for a little while and play around with. Is't a Canon J9ax5.4 with an 2x extender. I slapped it on, switched on my monitor and went: "OH MY GOD! YES, YES, YES!"

OK, bottom line. In my eyes - until proven otherwise - there is no need for a HD Lens. The pictures I saw where awsome. The 500 outperforms the HVX200 easily. Especially on the F-Stop and the noise.

I will post pictures and charts asap. But right now I have to write a script and meet with a client later today. :happy:

Peter
 
Wow - Nice lens, must be a great friend. I wish that my friends had some lenses to throw my way to check out for awhile.

I think we're in the same mindset - SD lenses are where it's at. They will get cheaper and cheaper as HD cameras become more prevalent. There's a few of us rolling around with only SD lenses that are posting. Hell, Hunter Richards SOLD his HD lens and got a couple of SD lenses.

I'm glad you like it Peter. If you have a chance, post up some full size screen shots so we can view for ourselves. Even some footage would be nice.

Thanks!
 
Don't worry. Charts and footage will come asap.
My friend is a nature videographer. A few years ago he went from DigiBeta to HDCAM. The lens was used on his "old" DigiBeta Equipment that has been retired. I edited some stuff he shot, so he lent me the lens until he needs it again. Like in a few years :happy:

Peter
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top