Barry_Green
Moderator
Sorry, that sounds like the same argument as saying "They shot House on a 5D, so surely it's good enough for you." I've never been a fan of that line of reasoning. Someone asked a question, I attempted to answer it. 5Ds may make pretty footage in one situation, and horrifically ugly footage in other situations -- and it was always thus, regardless of how many people tried to tell me I was wrong.I'll say it again and again and again. "IT'S A CAMERA THE SIZE OF A BOX OF MATCHES". Seems that 60mbps worked wonders here. If they can get this, why can't you?......
So someone asked if 60mbits was enough. I was trying to answer their specific question, comprehensively. I said it very well may be enough, and then tried to give some examples where the codec might possibly be stressed, so that folks could find out whether it works for them or not. I never said it couldn't shoot lava. I never said it wasn't "good enough" or even that it wasn't good enough for me. All I did was I tried to answer his question. I fail to see what's wrong with that.