Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People think that getting a certain camera is going to make them a better cinematographer, like their skill is perfect, its always the camera's fault their stuff doesn't look good.I do agree with discussions about easier control over things in certain cameras, but image is subjective, and give someone like Philip Bloom any camera, he makes them ALL look good.
I have to congratulate Nikon and the guys that made The Collector because they have achieved something very positive here. The "complainers" are not talking about the litany of complaints that permeate the forums lately. Many complains that may be real, imagined or exaggerated. No talk about noise, banding, blue banding, red banding, dead or alive pixels or 23.98 running at 23.97 or viceverversa. ...Congrats.
That's because not many have puchased the camera yet.
Philip Bloom is a very well respected cinematographer when it comes to DSLR's. He knows his stuff. Why do you think he, of all people, was called upon by George Lucas and other industry giants to show them the DSLR ropes and what they are capable of? He's that good.
http://philipbloom.net/films/
http://philipbloom.net/2009/12/12/skywalker/
The film in the link you posted, yeah, it looked decent, looks like some time went into making it, but I wasn't overly impressed with it. There are lots of films that I am very impressed with that were shot on DSLRs.
Just to confirm....you mean....people HERE on this forum, right? Because this camera sold out EVERYWHERE on the planet.
I am ready to buy it and will use it for stills as well as video. I knew the stills were going to be great, now I am sure the video will be good as well. After using the D90 for stills for too long and the Gh13 for video I can't wait to get my D7000.
Just to confirm....you mean....people HERE on this forum, right? Because this camera sold out EVERYWHERE on the planet. To the point that people were price gouging on Ebay since before the day it launched. This camera has ASTOUNDED photogs worldwide. I understand that we're talking video here....I get it....but your statement needed a little clarification: "...not many have purchased the camera yet" ....is COMPLETELY FALSE. "Not many people here on our forum have purchased it." Yes....totally true. ...and, NO, I don't expect that will change any time soon.
I for one look at this footage and feel a little frustrated. I see some VERY nice looking shots in there. I agree with John Caballero. Looks pretty clean to me...especially for how low-light they are shooting....a bit annoying yes...but, I see some great shots in there....so....congrats Nikon. I also agree that they were a little late with this camera for VIDEO purposes....most people are Canon or Panny committed now, and I think it's a little late for this effort. That said...photogs LOVE this camera....so...again...congrats Nikon!
(To finish...) I am frustrated that this happened so late in the game....bummer. Looks good to me though.
I think the main reason he was contacted by Lucasfilm is because his DSLR blog was the most established at the time and had the most recognizable"name" attached to DSLRs... that's marketing for you. He also, arguably, has the most experience... which doesn't always mean you're the best. He's good for sure... but it's all cinema verite as I said. This is a big difference between just shooting people and places, and actually staging set/actors with dialog and blocking narrative scenes.
This one looks really good too:
http://vimeo.com/18723280
We are starting to see morer footage coming out and it is looking better and better. What I also like is the many choices of excellent Nikon glass. Fully functional off the bat and with no need of adapters.