traviswears
Well-known member
That mixpre-d looks nice. Would adding that into the chain produce AF100 (audio-wise) level results? If so, and the picture is improved over the AF100, this could be a reasonable option for an upgrade to A-cam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That MixPre-D looks nice. Would adding that into the chain produce AF100 (audio-wise) level results?
... There is no AGC if it's anything like the Gh2. On GH2 you could turn of AGC and set levels ...
How exactly do I turn off the AGC in an unhacked GH2?
Yes, if the GH3 camera audio circuitry has a low noise-floor.
Using a Sound Devices MixPre-D mixer to feed LINE level audio signal to my GH2 camera through a passive BeachTek DXA-2s XLR adapter, my GH2 shows a noise-floor of -63 dB, which is the SAME noise level as my HMC-150 when recording from a LINE level source.
I am hoping the GH3 has an even better noise-floor rating, but even -63 dB is very usable for me. In theory the GH3 should be better when recording in H.264 formats, as the audio is stored as LPCM data.
Wait...does the Mixpre not have XLR ins?
So you have to have a Mixpre-d AND a Beachtek adapter? Sigh...someone please come out with a simple and compact solution for this!
Are you using the BeachTek in lieu of a padded cable?
But if it was a significant difference in quality... I might try it out.
Has anyone seen the mics on the GH3? They're pretty obvious on the GH2, but I can't find them on any pics I've seen of the GH3.
What sense adding mics to the back of a camera.
Look for two tiny holes near the EVF on the back of the camera.