Fujifilm X-H1 coming?

Other thoughts on the Fujifilm X-H1 after 2.0 firmware update in Dec 2018? I hear the IBIS works great after the update. Yes, the X-T3 has many advantages, but I still see good basic uses for the X-H1. Huge price drop (Body and Grip) has me a bit interested.
 
If IBIS truly works better (thought it was pretty mediocre just like Sony's...Panasonic and Olympus are worlds apart) then it's a nice price for the camera, but not too sure many will choose IBIS over those advantages you mentioned.

Maybe an underrated advantage for the X-H1 is no banding in F-Log (as discussed in the other thread).
 
NorBro said:
If IBIS truly works better (thought it was pretty mediocre just like Sony's...Panasonic and Olympus are worlds apart) then it's a nice price for the camera, but not too sure many will choose IBIS over those advantages you mentioned.

Maybe an underrated advantage for the X-H1 is no banding in F-Log (as discussed in the other thread).
Click to expand...

X-H1 totally has that magenta banding in F-log:

Fujifilm X-H1 sample movie- outdoors _ Cinema 4k _ 24p _ 200Mbit _ 200 ISO _ F-Log _ XF 16-55mm..jpg

Download the original F-log file from here: https://vimeo.com/261297710

In-camera Eterna recording is completely clean, free of artifacts, despite having exactly the same codec/bitrate settings: https://vimeo.com/261294340

On X-T2/X-H1 people kinda accept it because of 8bit, but X-T3 in 10bit 400Mbps HEVC shows it is just mind boggling. Something is definitely off in the demosaicing/mapping to F-log curve stage.
 
True, true...yeah, it would have to be much more prevalent for me to complain about it if I had a Fuji camera (or if it was like early 4.6K models and 1/3 of the image was pink/magenta on certain units).

In this case, most people wouldn't even notice it or care for that matter. (Only nerds like us on forums.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top