I've just pre-ordered an FS5m2. I've only shot on the FS5 once for a couple of vo actor days. Shot log-3 internal, overexposed 1.5 stops. Used a variety of good EF glass with metabones standard and metabones speedbooster. Loved the speedbooster look and speed, but both mounts felt loose which I didn't like.
While deciding on this next camera purchase, I was using a D850 with some good quality image stabilized glass. This will now become my B cam.
I'm looking for some reminders of what weaknesses to look out for with the FS5m2. I know some of them, but I'm not sure which ones may have been fixed in previous firmware patches.
For run-n-gun, I'm going to primarily shoot 10-bit 4:2:2 internal 1080p, slog3, overexposed 1-2 stops. I'll probably try the Venice profile for projects which don't require care and just need a quick shoot and export turnaround, but mostly I'll use slog3 and start with the Venice LUT.
I'll shoot 4K run-n-gun internal 4:2:0 8-bit when situations necessitate it, but I've read that 4K internal doesn't hold up well with slog3, that I should instead use slog2 or cine3 or cine4. I'm wary of how well I can pull focus using the FS5's screen when hand held, even utilizing the focus peaking. I may end up just finding a way to mount my Inferno on my back and use that for run-n-gun over internal, like a mesh back pack that let's it breathe (any other suggestions?).
Studio shooting will all be going out to the Inferno for ProRes RAW (once Premiere adds support) or ProResHQ in the meantime. For studio I plan on shooting at +2 to retain cleaner shadows. Speaking of which, how noisy is the image in the blacks compared to a C100, and when changing the ISO does it religiously need a black balance to reduce noise like the C100?
One thing I'm unclear on is the situation on external monitoring and LUTs for previewing while shooting. In which situations can you not externally monitor, and which situations can you not monitor an overexposed log signal with the appropriate LUT for preview?
Recently purchased some studio lights for subject and green screen a couple of wireless lavs and a shotgun, and with the FS5m2 is coming the kit lens, a Sachtler Ace L tripod, pelican 1510, and an active Nikon to E-mount adapter so I can use the current image stabilized Nikon glass. I was very disappointed to discover that there's no active Speedbooster for Nikon, and that Nikon ES lenses don't work with the Speedbooster. I'll be investing in more e-mount or EF w/ speedbooster when budget allows.
How are the quality of the XLRs on the FS5 compared to the Inferno? I think the noise floor on the Inferno is around -90dB.
While deciding on this next camera purchase, I was using a D850 with some good quality image stabilized glass. This will now become my B cam.
I'm looking for some reminders of what weaknesses to look out for with the FS5m2. I know some of them, but I'm not sure which ones may have been fixed in previous firmware patches.
For run-n-gun, I'm going to primarily shoot 10-bit 4:2:2 internal 1080p, slog3, overexposed 1-2 stops. I'll probably try the Venice profile for projects which don't require care and just need a quick shoot and export turnaround, but mostly I'll use slog3 and start with the Venice LUT.
I'll shoot 4K run-n-gun internal 4:2:0 8-bit when situations necessitate it, but I've read that 4K internal doesn't hold up well with slog3, that I should instead use slog2 or cine3 or cine4. I'm wary of how well I can pull focus using the FS5's screen when hand held, even utilizing the focus peaking. I may end up just finding a way to mount my Inferno on my back and use that for run-n-gun over internal, like a mesh back pack that let's it breathe (any other suggestions?).
Studio shooting will all be going out to the Inferno for ProRes RAW (once Premiere adds support) or ProResHQ in the meantime. For studio I plan on shooting at +2 to retain cleaner shadows. Speaking of which, how noisy is the image in the blacks compared to a C100, and when changing the ISO does it religiously need a black balance to reduce noise like the C100?
One thing I'm unclear on is the situation on external monitoring and LUTs for previewing while shooting. In which situations can you not externally monitor, and which situations can you not monitor an overexposed log signal with the appropriate LUT for preview?
Recently purchased some studio lights for subject and green screen a couple of wireless lavs and a shotgun, and with the FS5m2 is coming the kit lens, a Sachtler Ace L tripod, pelican 1510, and an active Nikon to E-mount adapter so I can use the current image stabilized Nikon glass. I was very disappointed to discover that there's no active Speedbooster for Nikon, and that Nikon ES lenses don't work with the Speedbooster. I'll be investing in more e-mount or EF w/ speedbooster when budget allows.
How are the quality of the XLRs on the FS5 compared to the Inferno? I think the noise floor on the Inferno is around -90dB.
