anatusa
Veteran
I would like a 4:2;2 50 mbps, but I would be surprised if that happened. On 60fps, I definitely feel like the current 24mpbs is not enough as I often noticed the image breaking up at 60fps.
well 4:2:2 is not going to happen as well as 50Mbps - avchd is 4:2:0 codec and the highest avchd standard is 2.0, and its what u have now on fs700. also u get 28Mbps 1080 60p...... as its what avchd 2.0 is, not 24Mbps!
the codec from C300 that you all(including my self) are dreaming about is not AVCHD. so u just cant get 4:2:2 because of the nature of avchd, it just not going to happen..... i would say relax, forget, and enjoy of what u payed for.
Hanad mentioned the weight of 2 cams C300 and FS700 ...... that c300 is lighter....., well according to what i see in specs its not.
http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/product-NEXFS700U/
Body only: 3 lbs. 2oz
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/839220-REG/Canon_5779B002_C300_Cinema_EOS_Camcorder.html
EOS C300: 3.2 lb (1.43 kg)
Grip: 8.1 oz (230 g)
Monitor Unit: 1.4 lb (620 g)
Handle Unit: 6.3 oz (180 g)
Thumb Rest: 0.35 oz (10 g)
BP-955 Battery: 7.8 oz (220 g)
2x CF Cards : 0.63 oz (18 g)
EOS C300 with Grip, Monitor, Handle, BP-955 & 2x CF Cards: 6.0 lb (2.70 kg)
looks like canon C300 weights more! i can tell that i played with it in canon store (body+monitor+handle+thumb rest+battary - no grip + L zoom lens) it was heavy for me not very comfortable, maybe its need time to get used to like to any other cam, but for sure it was not light!!!!
if you get Nanoflash with FS700 - you will get same 8 bit 4:2:2 codec like canon C300 has and even more as with nano u get 50-220mbps, but also the price difference will still be huge!
c300 is great for some one who has money, but also kind of sucks as its just 8 bit no 1080 60p and over/under crank only at 720p, - still i would buy it just for its sensor,EVF,codec,iso wheel,size and native EF

