Yeah I agree, and maybe acting in a class should be required at least once for all directors, like police with stun guns, they have to be stung once themselves so they know how it feels before they are issued one.
But also I think there are some director's that would rather shoot themselves than act and a lot of great directors who have never acted. So I think that people can get a lot of benefit from observing and understanding the acting process even if they don't do it themselves.
I attended a short filmmakers panel hosted by Roman Jaquez through Indie Club, and the panelist, who had had shorts at Sundance, etc. all said that you can have an out of focus shot, but you cannot, absolutely not, have bad acting.
But also I think there are some director's that would rather shoot themselves than act and a lot of great directors who have never acted. So I think that people can get a lot of benefit from observing and understanding the acting process even if they don't do it themselves.
Yes. You can have a low fi image, poor lighting, and only passable (though not bad sound), and acting can either make a technically imperfect piece great or a technically excellent piece unwatchable.tommyinla said:... what KILLS a production is poor acting ...
I attended a short filmmakers panel hosted by Roman Jaquez through Indie Club, and the panelist, who had had shorts at Sundance, etc. all said that you can have an out of focus shot, but you cannot, absolutely not, have bad acting.
Last edited: