Court precedent in the US allows for consumers to space and time shift their media for private use only which means making a back-up copy of a DVD or ripping a CD to put on your iPod is allowed under current copyright laws. It is the DMCA that makes breaking, by-passing, reverse engineering, etc. of DRM illegal. Unfortunately the courts in the US have so far sided w/the DMCA and allowed 20yrs of prior rulings to go up in smoke.
Thanks adkimery to bring this up. I'm surprised that it took until page 4 for this to come up.
In my mind, Sony v Universal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_v._Universal), is a court case that shaped my generation & changed our culture. If this case had gone another way there would be no such thing as VCRs, LDs, DVDs, DVRs, iPods, etc.
I think that copyright holders should protect their property, but I don't think they should be able to infringe on people's ability to "time-shift".
It is a delicate balance & a slippery slope.
-edit-
Reading more about this ruling I'm more apposed to it. We've lost balance & consumers are slipping down the slope. When SOC makes it possible to disable features on a home entertainment system, there should be more alarm bells going off.
There are good ways & bad ways to deal with people breaking the law, & to me, this isn't a good way. If there is a problem with people spitting gum on the ground, fine anyone you catch spitting their gum, don't cut off the tongue of every person purchasing a pack of gum.
Last edited: