SplitFieldDiopter
Active member
When watching older films (pre-NLE) I have always wondered why the fade outs looked more organic than the ones I was able to achieve with AVID or FCP.
The answer, I suppose, is obvious. Whether they were using an optical printer, or actually doing this in camera, they were preventing light from hitting the pickup device (in those days, film)
Now that I'm using fully manual cine lenses, I'm able to stop down the iris with a very smooth motion.
The left frame is a properly exposed image that I irised down to black.
The right frame is essentially the same shot, but I added the fade to black with FCP.
Both fades are 70 frames long and start at the exact same time.
You can tell the difference and the manual iris down looks more organic to me.
With our last movie, we shot some footage from the camera with the lens cap on to get a non-digital black. This, I find, is another step closer to achieving an organic look with digital tech.
The answer, I suppose, is obvious. Whether they were using an optical printer, or actually doing this in camera, they were preventing light from hitting the pickup device (in those days, film)
Now that I'm using fully manual cine lenses, I'm able to stop down the iris with a very smooth motion.
The left frame is a properly exposed image that I irised down to black.
The right frame is essentially the same shot, but I added the fade to black with FCP.
Both fades are 70 frames long and start at the exact same time.
You can tell the difference and the manual iris down looks more organic to me.
With our last movie, we shot some footage from the camera with the lens cap on to get a non-digital black. This, I find, is another step closer to achieving an organic look with digital tech.