androbot2084
Carbonite Member
Yes a lot of people think that interlace video is better than progressive video. The interlacers claim that progressive video is not real high definition and that all computer monitors should be 1080i interlace displays. However the thing that is holding back the interlacers from their interlace utopia is that they have not yet figured out how to invent a flat panel cathode ray tube that can display interlace video. Some interlacers even want more interlacing. For a time France had a 809 line triple interlacing scheme that took three 270 line fields to build up a frame. It is very easy to make a progressive scan monitor look like a interlace monitor and that is you just install a set of venetian blinds in front of the monitor to mimmick the NTSC analog legacy of black scan lines that interlace advocates love to see.
