Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"You must have skipped the part about: "Don't look at image quality here... this is a dirty debayer with no black calibration, no offset correction and no processing on a special 21 stop DR Chart from DSC.""
No. I didn't. Calibration and noise elimination are two entirely different things. After literal years of R&D, they chose to put this image out, and I'm responding to what's in it. Are we only allowed to notice positives, without negatives?
Perhaps it'll give a clean 15-16 stops. Or perhaps it'll give a clean, usable 12.x stops, as the image actually shows. The ball's in their court. This is an experiment at this stage, and nothing will be shipping for a long, long time.
"You must have skipped the part about: "Don't look at image quality here... this is a dirty debayer with no black calibration, no offset correction and no processing on a special 21 stop DR Chart from DSC.""
No. I didn't. Calibration and noise elimination are two entirely different things. After literal years of R&D, they chose to put this image out, and I'm responding to what's in it. Are we only allowed to notice positives, without negatives?
Perhaps it'll give a clean 15-16 stops. Or perhaps it'll give a clean, usable 12.x stops, as the image actually shows. The ball's in their court. This is an experiment at this stage, and nothing will be shipping for a long, long time.
They said the lens mount had a light leak... which was strange to me because, it's not that hard to get a lens mount light proofed... however, that would be like flashing film and if similar, would increase the lower end DR, because the darks get lifted.
Yea I was going batty with all the n00b FB posts and Twitter posts last night about "usable 20-21 stops of DR ahh!" Calm down folks. It's awesome. The fact a sensor even sees that much without all the processing, black calibration, color science, etc. is amazing...but I hate it when folks don't read, don't think, and post threads with titles like this one.
Not too strange, just speculating here but as engineering is concerned easy access to internals often helps with development process, so if they're only testing firmware and hardware and not looking at the image quality at the moment light leaks might not be priorityTho I wouldnt say that it increases the lower end DR, but rather lifts the blacks and wash out the lower end of the chart.
Relax, mate. I did write; "How many of the stops can be effectively used is anyone's guess - from the picture though, I'd say 16, or 17 stops."
Seems to me they posted it just in time a month or so before the new F's start shipping.![]()
Seems to me they posted it just in time a month or so before the new F's start shipping.![]()
They promised months ago that a Dragon announcement would happen before the end of the year. I believe the original plan was to have a little more show and tell by now but Dragon has proved to be a lot more and hence the delay. In any case, I'll be trading in my Scarlet, but I doubt it will be anytime soon.
Considering that image actually exists, both questions have already been answered: Yes, they apparently do have the electronics to do this, and yes, to debayer the image, the codec must have allowed for that much data to be stored in the first place.Yes I imagine it will be another year before the option is actually an available option - and who's to say it won't "change again"?
All that aside, who the hell really needs 20 stops of dynamic range and more importantly will 16-bit linear raw really be enough for that much dynamic range? A lot will be lost unless there is a good ADC on-board capable of even processing 20 stops off the sensor.
Like I said, "another year away" for sure.
It's kind of weird - but I would feel intimidated having 15+ stops of dynamic range, and sensitivity greater than the human eye. It's like being in a room with no walls - a bit of agoraphobia.
I need limits to be creative, damnit!
RED should not upgrade EPIC's but design a new camera body with new optimized powering and cooling scheme.
It doesn't matter whether the technology is available in a ready-to-use format, but that it's there at all, stuffing it all into a small box is merely a detail that Mr. Moore is very good at solving. Assuming they used 16-bit ADCs, that would still cap the DR to 16 stops, so how are they reading 20 at once?Its all development and fraken-rigged right now, what makes you think the new boards are already printed and ready to go?
My suspicion is RED will have to move from the linear RAW format to a LOG based one. It is the only way to capture 20-bit precision in a smaller bit-depth format. Similar to ARRI and how their 10-bit LOG signal carries about as much information as a 12-bit linear signal does, and 12-bit LOG carries as much information as a 14-bit linear signal does.
Will Dragon bid farewell to 16-bit linear?