Dvxer Timur Civan makes the news on Wired

OldCorpse

Rockin the Boat
102 Year-Old Lens on Canon 5D MkII.

"Timur Civan is a director of photography for movies, and a photographer. He’s also a tinkerer, and he got his hands on an old Wollensak 35mm F5.0 Cine-Velostigmat, a hand cranked movie-camera lens from 1908. You see it above, wedded to his Canon 5D MkII. But where did it come from?

Civan got a call from his friend, known mysteriously only as “a Russian lens technician”:

He found in a box of random parts, hidden inside anther lens this gem. A circa 1908 (possibly earlier) 35mm lens. Still functioning, mostly brass, and not nearly as much dust or fungus as one would think after sitting in a box for over a hundred years. This lens is a piece of motion picture history, and at this point rare beyond words. So I say to him, “Wow… what do you have in mind?” he smiles, and says, (in the thickest Russian accent you can imagine) “I can make this fit EF you know…”

The results are astonishing. This century-old hunk of glass and brass makes a great picture. There’s vignetting at the edges, a softness and a lack of biting contrast. There’s also a color-shift in the non-black-and-white images. In short, the lens adds all the tweaks you might do in post-processing to Holga-fy your pictures. Civan is planning on shooting some footage with the lens, too, which is its purpose after all, and promises to share the results on the Cinema 5D forums, where he posted his photographs."
 
Romantic and novel...

but I think I will stick with modern, computer-designed lenses with their multi-coatings and extra low dispersion fluorite elements.
 
Thanks guys!

im having fun w this thing... it takes such cool photos. unpredictacble, and wild is the onlywords for it. we take for granted stable coated, computer designed optics...
 
Civan is planning on shooting some footage with the lens, too, which is its purpose after all, and promises to share the results on the Cinema 5D forums, where he posted his photographs."

come on timur, quit holding out on us and post the footage on dvxuser. :beer:
 
Footage looks great. I'm waiting for you to discover some sort of microdot from the KGB. You never know...
 
Aside the fine joke, how can you call a russian 1908 lens of communist? :huh:
That would be a Tsarist lens.

Very nice footage. Amazing it holds up so well for being that old. But mostly the lighting and design and composition are what I'm looking at. Us DVX geeks probably need to see some sort of side by side. But thanks for sharing, looks super.

When I was more into advertising and still photography there would be old studio (and some field) guys who would seek out old multi-coated Dagor "red dot" and "gold dot" lenses. On a smaller format camera these lenses would be considered soft, but they gave a very subtle look, and on a 8x10 Sinar shooting reversal film, that subtle difference was the difference. These lenses are now very, very expensive to obtain. On a similar note, when shooting large format out in the field the Schneider G-Claron lenses just had something about their low-contrast/ultra sharp look that made them stand out.

Sorry for such a digression! Your comments in that article on the subtle ways the lens vignettes at times and looks contrasty, or washed out, at others made me think of that.
 
Back
Top