DVX100 PAL Footage
- Thread starter DVXCAMBOY
- Start date
J.R. Hudson
Spirit Animal
Re: DVX100 PAL Footage
Remember, it depends on who actually shot the footage! I'm sure if I submitted footage I shot and Vilmos Zsigmond submitted footage he shot....
Well, you get the idea.
Remember, it depends on who actually shot the footage! I'm sure if I submitted footage I shot and Vilmos Zsigmond submitted footage he shot....
Well, you get the idea.
Re: DVX100 PAL Footage
http://homepage.mac.com/shailevy/camera/presentzimmer.html
this is an "untouched" material that i shot and edited
http://homepage.mac.com/shailevy/camera/presentzimmer.html
this is an "untouched" material that i shot and edited
J.R. Hudson
Spirit Animal
Re: DVX100 PAL Footage
Always a fan of whatever Shai shoots. Especially 5 after 6!
Always a fan of whatever Shai shoots. Especially 5 after 6!
frank
Member
Re: DVX100 PAL Footage
Shai I'd like to hear your comments about shooting in "widescreen" mode with the DVX100 camera. Good and Bad...Do you frame your subject whilst looking through the "squished up" image on the viewfinder or do you have other means of judging your framing? ( a separate 16:9 monitor for example)
Also, I'd like to hear your comments, positive and negative about using a 16:9 adaptor on this camera? Nice footage by the way of "5 after 6" !
Shai I'd like to hear your comments about shooting in "widescreen" mode with the DVX100 camera. Good and Bad...Do you frame your subject whilst looking through the "squished up" image on the viewfinder or do you have other means of judging your framing? ( a separate 16:9 monitor for example)
Also, I'd like to hear your comments, positive and negative about using a 16:9 adaptor on this camera? Nice footage by the way of "5 after 6" !
Re: DVX100 PAL Footage
thanks frank,
first, "5 nach 6" is "5 to 6" (hey john, what about you german?!... )
seconds, i didn't use here an anamorphic adapter, only the in-camera 16:9 mode, therefore, in this accession, i didn't work with a squeezed picture.
when i did have a chance to work with the ana, it took me a little to get use to the squeezed picture (most of the times i worked handheld.. so i really had to), but the 16:9 monitor was always there for cases of doubt.
dont know why, but a squeezed AND cropped image (i.e. 2.35:1) was easier to adjust to, than a squeezed 16:9 in 4:3.
but in both cases it is possible. best would be to practice a little and adapt your "framing rules" to the squeezed display mode.
thanks frank,
first, "5 nach 6" is "5 to 6" (hey john, what about you german?!...
) seconds, i didn't use here an anamorphic adapter, only the in-camera 16:9 mode, therefore, in this accession, i didn't work with a squeezed picture.
when i did have a chance to work with the ana, it took me a little to get use to the squeezed picture (most of the times i worked handheld.. so i really had to), but the 16:9 monitor was always there for cases of doubt.
dont know why, but a squeezed AND cropped image (i.e. 2.35:1) was easier to adjust to, than a squeezed 16:9 in 4:3.
but in both cases it is possible. best would be to practice a little and adapt your "framing rules" to the squeezed display mode.