ggoerl
Active member
I plan on buying a dvx but I was also looking at two other cameras. the xl2 and the fx1. I was considering the other two due to the fact that I saw how impressive they looked with a 35 adapter. But they all look good with a 35 adapter. so its hard for me to choose. So either the xl2, Dvx or The fx1
but If I get the dvx should I get the pal? whats the big difference between the ntsc model? lines of resolution if so by how much of a difference?
I was looking at the fx1 never thought of it before but since I saw the footage with that 35 adapter it looks good.
im kinda skeptical about spending money because Im kinda waiting to see what kinda hd cam canon comes up with
hopefully hdxl or something along the lines. but thats what im hoping for. but if I get the fx1 I wouldnt mine
waiting for a pricedrop. since my vx dropped $1000 after like 8 months to a year. but if you wait so long and then finally buy the
camera they always come out with another model better like right after you buy it? coincidence? I can wait for a hd cause theyre will probably be something better. canon should pull through. or maybe the next dvx.
but If I get the dvx should I get the pal? whats the big difference between the ntsc model? lines of resolution if so by how much of a difference?
I was looking at the fx1 never thought of it before but since I saw the footage with that 35 adapter it looks good.
im kinda skeptical about spending money because Im kinda waiting to see what kinda hd cam canon comes up with
hopefully hdxl or something along the lines. but thats what im hoping for. but if I get the fx1 I wouldnt mine
waiting for a pricedrop. since my vx dropped $1000 after like 8 months to a year. but if you wait so long and then finally buy the
camera they always come out with another model better like right after you buy it? coincidence? I can wait for a hd cause theyre will probably be something better. canon should pull through. or maybe the next dvx.