DIY video transmitter

Very impressive. How did you make the connectors both inputs and outputs? I hope you have a big heatsink on your regulator if you're letting people pump 35 v through it and get 9 v out. How much current does it draw?

-Andrew
 
Hoarp didn't have any circuit diagrams. I told him to buy a Video Sender from Maplin here in the UK. He then re-housed it in a die cast box and said he designed it. I provided the information on how to reduce 12 volts to 7.5 volts, in order to run it off his Stedicam Battery.
It is not impressive because he didn't design it.

The reason I have exposed him as a fraud is that he posted a PRIVATE conversation we had here on DVX.
Chill, man. You and Peter should discuss this privately, not in this thread.
 
Ugh I knew it was you david, why cant you keep the same name for longer than two weeks.

You dont know that I followed your advice, I did mention I have other very good electronics freinds. Since doing the follow focus I have brushed up on surface mount electronics and with the electronic components available now you can make stuff like this pretty easily without having to rehouse things.

I did rehouse a maplin sender which kind of worked but a director I work with regularly complained that it was unreliable and it was right. A bit of work with my electronics freinds and some breadbarding and parts-ordering later solved the issue.

I do remember talking about this with you but I dont ever remember taking much advice, past rehomeing a maplin video sender, which I think is farily obvious.

Wernt you banned from the forum anyway....
​
 
But it is the truth! I had a private conversation with him, and he posted for all to see. He doesn't respect private conversations. If I discuss this with him, it will not be Private.

So what if it is the truth or not? Get over it. This thread is not the place to have this discussion.
 
Mm, show me something that I repeated that was said in private... I dont remember saying anything that we said in private..
 
just google on wireless video transmitters and you will find thousands of links...

for example one of my favorite websites for spyware....
brickhouse.com :)
ttp://www.brickhousesecurity.com/pvts-2.html
US$180 only :)

yhst-81126207287951_2020_26331140


  • 300 ft Line Of Sight
  • 4 Channel Opperation
  • Auto Switch Receiver
The 2.4 GHz Pocket Video Transmitter is so easy to use anyone can convert a wired camera to a wireless camera. Our Pocket Video Transmitter features 4 Channel Operation and is perfect for body-worn applications.

The batteries last approximately 3-4 hours when connected to the transmitter and a camera, approximately 8 hours when connected to the transmitter only.
So why making one by yourself if it is cheaper and easier to buy one... :Drogar-Dum(DBG):

In practice, good for 6 hrs with a reach of 60 meters distance, depends on disturbances from other services. Can really advice this solution, it's cheap and for monitor purposes, perfect! To make it more professional looking, you can indeed build it into a little black box with higher-end connectors. Stick also a fake logo on it and it rlooks like a device of 1K. This unit looks for me 'professional' enough. If you hang it somewhere on your rig, nobody will notice it and see it more as a part of your professional gear.

Got the idea for a TV production. We needed to film from the viewpoint of a contestant during one of the survival games. Using a cable was not possible, so we filmed it with a small spycam and wireless transmission. Full HD quality was not required as everyone would understand that it was filmed with a small camera. After the show I started to used it as a wireless monitor system to keep my client off the set, or at least on 15 meters irritating-free distance.

This website has more toys that I am currently using... :Drogar-Dum(DBG)::Drogar-Dum(DBG)::Drogar-Dum(DBG):

For ex. lojack your gear... build a GPS tracker in your rig or pelican case and when it is stolen, you can easy track where it is... also ideal for people who rent there equipment out... note on the case that your equipment is lojacked or GPS trackable, and that scare them away... I have my equipment lojacked... idea came when I was shooting in a very hostile country and our executive producer insist that we and our equipment got lojacked, was required for the insurrance and our safety...
 
why not a UHF transmitter

why not a UHF transmitter

I fail to see the advantage of this DIY unit or 180 dollar model over something like this at $25.00:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Wireless-UHF-Au...8657064QQihZ007QQcategoryZ11726QQcmdZViewItem
When used with a portable LCD TV and a (built in) standard UHF tuner.
Of course you can change the antenna on that unit to a rubber duckie type probably pretty easily.

I know this particular model at ebay is AC powered, but like most devices of this type it probably has an internal AC to DC voltage converter that is far easier to hack than starting from scratch. Also , if you look around you will probably find one that has a DC input (or low voltage AC) on the unit itself.

In fact I bought a similar unit 15 years ago and it worked great. The unit I bought had a 12V DC input and a replaceable antenna. Worked right out of the box with a battery pack and transmitting to a TV

As for 2.4Ghz, as someone posted, forget it. Try those in a place with multiple Wireless Network access points and you will find out they run on crowded frequencies. Not to mention you can unintentionally disable a wireless network at the location with them

I mean I know a project can be fun, but also can be frustrating. Also how muchg money does someone want to throw away on "industrial grade" products when the consumer marked drives the professional market.

Also on the DIY unit whether the unit was properly terminated when using a T connector. I suspect one would end up with double terminated video , unless there was an auto terminating input , which I douibt. Double termination is the worst thing you can do to a video signal.
 
Last edited:
You don't have to see the advantage my friend. Everyone is different, and have different viewpoints.
Peter is aware that you only terminate the last unit in a Transmission Line, therefore the signal would not be Double Terminated.
I think it is perhaps unwise to assume other members don't have your level of expertise this early in your membership.
 
Back
Top