My real training is as a director for theatre -- though the end result may be different it's a whole different ball game.
Most of what I have learned about working with actors has come from taking Camera Acting classes -- there's a big difference in this and scene study classes, which are more like rehearsing for a play.
So yeah -- see if you can get in an ON CAMERA acting class. Either as an actor or --- one thing I did -- I offered to shoot the class for a master teacher -- he was ecstatic - he didn't have to fumble withe the vide camera as he transitioned back and forth to lecture and scene work -- the camera was all set up and of course looked 10 times better than what the class was used to -- I've done it where I just shot and also where I participated in the class -- but either way, I didn't have to pay
But signing up for a good on camera acting class can really open up doors to the directorial process of working with actors. A good camera class should have the students working ON CAMERA almost all if not all of the time, and have the students reviewing their work on a monitor.
Things such as the actors responisbility take to take willl should be discussed and what it means to act in Master, Medium, Closeup, EX CU, etc. as each is subtley different, as well as the actors responsibility to continuity.
In a good class the actors can't help but learn a little about how a film is put together (master, medium, etc) and why continuity is important.
Conversly - a director posing as an actor in such a class will also learn about the actors process and what sort of cues or information an actor needs.
We all read and covet Barry's DVX book but working with actors is a much more ephimeral task than mastering the DVX yet this kind of training or technical ability is just not as sought for or reveared --- my feeling is that's partially due to just not knowing what's out there in terms of classes etc. and partly because acting, and the guidance of actors is underestimated as easy -- I mean it's just walking and talking -- who can't do that right :cheesy:
Most of what I have learned about working with actors has come from taking Camera Acting classes -- there's a big difference in this and scene study classes, which are more like rehearsing for a play.
So yeah -- see if you can get in an ON CAMERA acting class. Either as an actor or --- one thing I did -- I offered to shoot the class for a master teacher -- he was ecstatic - he didn't have to fumble withe the vide camera as he transitioned back and forth to lecture and scene work -- the camera was all set up and of course looked 10 times better than what the class was used to -- I've done it where I just shot and also where I participated in the class -- but either way, I didn't have to pay
But signing up for a good on camera acting class can really open up doors to the directorial process of working with actors. A good camera class should have the students working ON CAMERA almost all if not all of the time, and have the students reviewing their work on a monitor.
Things such as the actors responisbility take to take willl should be discussed and what it means to act in Master, Medium, Closeup, EX CU, etc. as each is subtley different, as well as the actors responsibility to continuity.
In a good class the actors can't help but learn a little about how a film is put together (master, medium, etc) and why continuity is important.
Conversly - a director posing as an actor in such a class will also learn about the actors process and what sort of cues or information an actor needs.
We all read and covet Barry's DVX book but working with actors is a much more ephimeral task than mastering the DVX yet this kind of training or technical ability is just not as sought for or reveared --- my feeling is that's partially due to just not knowing what's out there in terms of classes etc. and partly because acting, and the guidance of actors is underestimated as easy -- I mean it's just walking and talking -- who can't do that right :cheesy: