Deuceofspades
Veteran
IMDB ratings use a formula that is designed to detect and penalize those who try to "game" the system. While the exact formula is kept secret, it's pretty obvious that if there's a disproportionate and unrealistic number of 10's in your rating, IMDB tosses them out. It's all too common for people to send out a call to action to all their friends and family and coworkers to say "rate my film high" and people just plug in a "10" and think that's gonna guarantee a high rating. But IMDB is smarter than that, and when they see what they consider a self-inflated rating, they chop it way down. Do they nuke all the 10's? Maybe, I don't know.
Do some genuinely good films get penalized by this? Absolutely. Unquestionably. I've seen films that are a good solid 6, that carry an IMDB rating of 2.3 because of the "friends and family" effect.
I'm sure the ratings will equalize once there are many more votes, where it becomes obvious that it can't be a "friends and family" effect. Faith's film right now has only 189 votes. 77 of those are a "10". Look at it from IMDB's perspective: is it reasonable to suspect that if someone were cheating the system, that they could get sixty or seventy people to give a film a 10? Sure, maybe. So they keep a tight lid on those low-vote-count films. But once there's, say, 1000 votes... if 600 of those are a 10, I bet you you'll see Faith's ratings on IMDB skyrocket. Assuming the film is that good, of course... I haven't seen it, I've been waiting for NetFlix to get it, but I think I'm just gonna go push her sales figure from 8,000 to 8,001...
By the way, let's be clear -- I'm not saying there are ANY fake ratings on Faith's film's IMDB profile. There may be substantially higher ratings than would otherwise be given due to the cast 'n' crew 'n' family 'n' friends phenomenon, or there may not be. I don't know. But it is a common-enough thing that IMDB has instituted a special formula to try to catch it and to discredit "family & friends" votes. Faith's pic is such a targeted genre that it is entirely possible that every single vote is legit, and that those in her target market do actually feel that it is worthy of that many "10"'s. I think it's fair to say that teen girls rank "Twilight" higher than the general public does, right? So if Faith's film is appealing directly to the hot-rodders and those are the people voting, then they may very well be giving higher ratings than would be expected of a typical film, reaching a general audience. Which is another way of saying -- it's entirely possible that every single one of Faith's votes are legit.
The only way this situation can be rectified is by more and more voting. If you've seen "Deuce of Spades", go on IMDB and rank it. Rank it what you think it really deserves. Rank it as high as you think it earns, or as low as you think it earns, but give a real and honest vote of feedback. That's the only way that the system can work.
Even when I threw out ALL THE 10 VOTES I still could not come up with 4.1 ... And you'd better believe that every single one of these votes is legit. In fact Imdb has thousands of people very pissed at them right now, for giving the film low ratings. This number is about to grow leaps and bounds as my film was just crowned on most read HOT ROD MAGAZINE (9 million readers) "best hot rod film since American Graffiti".
Now, I have a friend with a car film also listed on Imdb. He got 220 votes, of which 46 are 10 and 65 are 0 and 18 are 1 and 17 are 2 - his current Imdb "weighed rating is 4.5" - his straight arythmetic average rating is 4.1
Mmmmmm... Coincidentally he sells his film on amazon, which owns Imdb. DEUCE OF SPADES is not an amazon product... thereby potentially competing with amazon.
This make Imdb look even worse in the eye of the public.