Hey all!
***Please don't TLDR this thread***. I've been wanting to ask this question since the recent developments on hacking the D7000 firmware appeared, and I thought this was one of the best communities to raise the question to (don't hate me
).
D7000 users: Can we possibly establish the real reason behind the 20 minute video limit in our DSLRs? I know the issue has been brought up before around the web, but I don't find most of the given answers satisfactory. I'd like to hear your opinions.
So, I'll start us off with what has been suggested before, and my thoughts on each:
1. Overheating
This reason has been quotes for many cameras; sometimes it is legit, sometimes not. I tend to think not. Some have pointed out that overheating tends to happen more to compact cameras, due to the lack of space for heat dissipation. DSLRs would tend to benefit from their larger mirror box and lower sensor pixel density, meaning less heat production and better heat dissipation.
I do know that I personally have recorded 60-80 minute sessions of video straight (20 minutes clips of course, with about 1.5 seconds delay between each) several times without problems and without any noticeable damage to the camera. At the end an 80 minute session (limited by battery going flat) I would estimate the camera was perhaps 15C warmer than ambient temperature to the touch, probably not much more than that. That's still cooler that some of the compact HD camcorders I've used before. (Someone please warn me if this is actually damaging my camera!)
2. Sensor/Image processor incapable
Actually I think this one was more in regards to frame-rates, but it's one of the possibilities on the list. Again, doesn't sound likely, partly because of the ability to take several 20 minutes clips in succession with a very minimal delay in between, and partly because the EXPEED 2 processor seems pretty capable.
3. FAT32 4GB file limit
This one is plausible. The FAT32 file system is by nature limited to a maximum size of 4GB for any one file. Throwing a 4GB SDHC card in my D7000 and setting the movie mode to 1080/24 @ 20Mb/s (highest quality) show me that the card can hold 22 minutes, to the 20 minute limit would be a good place to set the limit. What this theory doesn’t explain is why the maximum time doesn’t increase with the lower resolution/bitrate movie modes. One would think that Nikon would set the maximum time to be the closest duration yielding a 4GB file at the given bitrate. Opinions on this one particularly would be appreciated.
4. EU camcorder tax
This one again sounds plausible, maybe even likely, but we lack evidence. It has been stated in many places around the web that the EU impose a greater tax on camcorders than on still cameras. In several places the definition of a camcorder is said to be any camera that can record more than 30 minutes of continuous video at either a resolution higher than 800x600 pixels or a frame rate higher than 23fps [citation needed]. However, is this issue great enough to be the sole reason Nikon imposes a lower time limit? Probably, but the topic would benefit from some debate. Opinions on this one would be greatly appreciated.
So, what does everyone think? Maybe you have a different suggestion than the ones above. Go ahead and put it up here!
Thanks,
Matt
**I’ll leave my reasoning for this discussion for the second post. See below if you need to know.
***Please don't TLDR this thread***. I've been wanting to ask this question since the recent developments on hacking the D7000 firmware appeared, and I thought this was one of the best communities to raise the question to (don't hate me
D7000 users: Can we possibly establish the real reason behind the 20 minute video limit in our DSLRs? I know the issue has been brought up before around the web, but I don't find most of the given answers satisfactory. I'd like to hear your opinions.
So, I'll start us off with what has been suggested before, and my thoughts on each:
1. Overheating
This reason has been quotes for many cameras; sometimes it is legit, sometimes not. I tend to think not. Some have pointed out that overheating tends to happen more to compact cameras, due to the lack of space for heat dissipation. DSLRs would tend to benefit from their larger mirror box and lower sensor pixel density, meaning less heat production and better heat dissipation.
I do know that I personally have recorded 60-80 minute sessions of video straight (20 minutes clips of course, with about 1.5 seconds delay between each) several times without problems and without any noticeable damage to the camera. At the end an 80 minute session (limited by battery going flat) I would estimate the camera was perhaps 15C warmer than ambient temperature to the touch, probably not much more than that. That's still cooler that some of the compact HD camcorders I've used before. (Someone please warn me if this is actually damaging my camera!)
2. Sensor/Image processor incapable
Actually I think this one was more in regards to frame-rates, but it's one of the possibilities on the list. Again, doesn't sound likely, partly because of the ability to take several 20 minutes clips in succession with a very minimal delay in between, and partly because the EXPEED 2 processor seems pretty capable.
3. FAT32 4GB file limit
This one is plausible. The FAT32 file system is by nature limited to a maximum size of 4GB for any one file. Throwing a 4GB SDHC card in my D7000 and setting the movie mode to 1080/24 @ 20Mb/s (highest quality) show me that the card can hold 22 minutes, to the 20 minute limit would be a good place to set the limit. What this theory doesn’t explain is why the maximum time doesn’t increase with the lower resolution/bitrate movie modes. One would think that Nikon would set the maximum time to be the closest duration yielding a 4GB file at the given bitrate. Opinions on this one particularly would be appreciated.
4. EU camcorder tax
This one again sounds plausible, maybe even likely, but we lack evidence. It has been stated in many places around the web that the EU impose a greater tax on camcorders than on still cameras. In several places the definition of a camcorder is said to be any camera that can record more than 30 minutes of continuous video at either a resolution higher than 800x600 pixels or a frame rate higher than 23fps [citation needed]. However, is this issue great enough to be the sole reason Nikon imposes a lower time limit? Probably, but the topic would benefit from some debate. Opinions on this one would be greatly appreciated.
So, what does everyone think? Maybe you have a different suggestion than the ones above. Go ahead and put it up here!
Thanks,
Matt
**I’ll leave my reasoning for this discussion for the second post. See below if you need to know.
Last edited: