Collateral - While we are talking Hi-Def

Re: Collateral - While we are talking Hi-Def

[quote author=Rich Lee link=board=sony;num=1103172388;start=15#15 date=12/19/04 at 02:58:51]...it had a strange look, they obviously werent trying to mimic film with these cameras.
[/quote]

I read where they intentionally upped the Gain pretty high to get the look Mann wanted.

I thought this film was great; one of those types of films one of us DVX'ers could pull off (Minus the umpteen aerials of L.A.). It was nice to see Tom play this part.

I was watching the DVD and the Subway scenes are done in Green Screen. That's awesome.
 
Re: Collateral - While we are talking Hi-Def

..yep hayden thats the same one i posted a while back.. only i just linked to the pic instead of the page.. cause the page says which is which. and as we know when certain people see that.. all of a sudden they start spouting about how they knew it before they read that and how they could tell and had a feeling ... blah blah blah. whatever. its near impossible to tell the difference, and if both were being screened from 35mm onto a very large screen i think that only jaded fools would profess to know which was which.


i watched collateral again last night, and alot of exterior scenes you could tell that the gain or pedestal was up . the blacks were washed out, and it was generally muddy. and then there were some that were spot on. but in general -without knowing which scenes were shot on what i woudnt have had a clue at all that it wasnt all 35mm. 3 different cameras..2 being video wouldnt have even crossed my mind if i just blindly went to the theatre and saw it. sure some scenes looked a bit videoish, but ive seen plenty of 35mm that looked similar.. all depends how you treat it.

..and i had absolutely no clue that the subway was all green screen.. WOW!
 
Re: Collateral - While we are talking Hi-Def

I can personally tell the difference between an Arri, Pani and Sony.

(I jest)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top