Dan Hudgins
Well-known member
1. Noise pattern.
Very peculiar. Very much similar to film grain. But the chroma noise felt a little high. Maybe it will change but maybe it wont.
The noise in the Cineform (tm) results can be different than using the CinemaDNG frames. When processed in my free de-Bayer program temporal noise reduction can be applied and even at EI ISO 1280 you can get almost noiseless looking results. If the footage is converted to H.264 for Vimeo some compression noise may be added that was not so pronounced in the uncompressed version. Its hard to show the quality of the camera other than making a 35mm film transfer or maybe a DCP for showing in a Digital Movie Theater from the DNG frames. You can also apply noise reduction to the Cineform (tm) workflow, but starting with the DNG you may get the best results.
2. Sharpness
It felt a little soft. Certainly not digital pin sharp, but even for film, I would say a little soft. Maybe its the lens. Which lenses were used ? Alvins shots and also shots from China. Is there an OLPF ? Would it affect resolving power ?
The camera has a OLPF filter, so some sharpen needs to be applied to the LUMA in order to compensate for that, you don't want to sharpen the CHROMA as Bayer sensors all have low saturation filters so the noise in the chroma is higher than in the LUMA, and also because of chroma aliasing you don't want to sharpen the chroma, in my free de-Bayer program I have area filters to de-noise the chroma as is common in digital cameras that do in camera processing. Cineform (tm) is running in real time playback so maybe not doing heavy processing to get a smooth look with just the codec adjustments.
3. Color
Not as bad as the Red cameras, but I felt the colors were a little bit muted. Only a bit. Probably thats the character of this sensor. Maybe I need to see more vibrant footage.
Bayer filters have low saturation so that all pixels give some LUMA detail. In order to see bright colors the contrast and saturation need to be graded from the raw data. In order to play the Cineform (tm) to match the in camera monitoring the camera makes a 3D-LUT that you can load into Cineform (tm) codec that will adjust both the brightness, contrast and saturation. If you are grading without using the 3D-LUT from the raw data, then you need to make the brightness, contrast, S-curve and saturation matrix adjustments manually. The saturation of the red, green, and blue from the sensor is not equal so you need to increase the saturation un-evenly using a 9 value matrix, just using the saturation control in some grading software may give unbalanced saturation. My free de-Bayer program has the needed adjustments to get level saturation and the right curve to adjust the exposure EI ISO to normal monitor or gamma corrections.
Keep in mind that when film scans are processed they are de-grained and dust busted and in general transferred to chroma sub-sampled formats that reduce the chroma grain of film stocks. Without de-graining of the film scans the results would probably look higher noise than the KineRAW-S35 (tm) at ISO 2560 since the film would need to be force processed to get an image at that speed.

