Hello everyone,
Although I'm a first time poster I'm a long time reader, and I'd like to say that the discussions found on this forum have been infinitely helpful to me and have taught me quite a lot about DV that I never knew before. Thanks a lot!
My question: I just got a new computer for editing and I had planned to buy a small camcorder to use to capture footage from my DVX to round out the package. While discussing this at work one of my colleagues claimed that using a cheap camcorder to capture dv footage, especially 24p or 30p footage, will not give the same quality as capturing with the DVX or a real mini DV deck. Is this true?
I understand that the DV format is supposed to have no generation loss through dubs due to its digital nature, but is it possible that a very cheap camcorder simply does not do the job properly?
The colleague of mine claims to have done tests with his sony camcorder (a trv-9000 maybe?) and a cheaper camcorder to capture, and says that image quality is better when the footage was captured with the camcorder he shot the footage with.
Please, if anybody with the technical knowledge could respond, and tell me if there is any factual basis to these claims! I'd be happy to shell out $600-700 for a deck if I knew it would give me better quality video captures, but I'd certainly rather save the money and buy a $200 camcorder for the job! Thanks in advance and I look forward to your wisdom - Joe
Although I'm a first time poster I'm a long time reader, and I'd like to say that the discussions found on this forum have been infinitely helpful to me and have taught me quite a lot about DV that I never knew before. Thanks a lot!
My question: I just got a new computer for editing and I had planned to buy a small camcorder to use to capture footage from my DVX to round out the package. While discussing this at work one of my colleagues claimed that using a cheap camcorder to capture dv footage, especially 24p or 30p footage, will not give the same quality as capturing with the DVX or a real mini DV deck. Is this true?
I understand that the DV format is supposed to have no generation loss through dubs due to its digital nature, but is it possible that a very cheap camcorder simply does not do the job properly?
The colleague of mine claims to have done tests with his sony camcorder (a trv-9000 maybe?) and a cheaper camcorder to capture, and says that image quality is better when the footage was captured with the camcorder he shot the footage with.
Please, if anybody with the technical knowledge could respond, and tell me if there is any factual basis to these claims! I'd be happy to shell out $600-700 for a deck if I knew it would give me better quality video captures, but I'd certainly rather save the money and buy a $200 camcorder for the job! Thanks in advance and I look forward to your wisdom - Joe