mickeloaf
Well-known member
Hey Folks;
I'm in the planning stage of a project and I'm trying to weight the benifits of buying a DVX100a vs. renting an SDX900 (or even doing both).
Some of the attributes of the project are:
* Must be filmed in 16:9
* Lots of bluescreen/greenscreen work
* Initial release on DVD
* I need to keep the possibility of tranfer to 35mm later.
I desire the best raw footage as possible for convincing chroma keying, color, etc. I'm considering using a DVX100 for most of the non-chroma scenes, and just renting the SDX900 for the chroma work, but I'm not sure if the disparity between image aquisition will be too great?
Anyone have any thoughts on this subject? ???
I'm in the planning stage of a project and I'm trying to weight the benifits of buying a DVX100a vs. renting an SDX900 (or even doing both).
Some of the attributes of the project are:
* Must be filmed in 16:9
* Lots of bluescreen/greenscreen work
* Initial release on DVD
* I need to keep the possibility of tranfer to 35mm later.
I desire the best raw footage as possible for convincing chroma keying, color, etc. I'm considering using a DVX100 for most of the non-chroma scenes, and just renting the SDX900 for the chroma work, but I'm not sure if the disparity between image aquisition will be too great?
Anyone have any thoughts on this subject? ???