Jorn van Oostende
Active member
Looks to me he's taking cue from the director like a good camera op. should or did the producer just fire him(?)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BMD success has very little to do with marketing (which, I would argue, is only average). What Petty may have stumbled into was a realization that the photo-video market on the medium-to-pro half is horribly inefficient, with the Japanese conglomerates often protecting each other (to say nothing of the various cross-ownership of these conglomerates) to the detriment of the consumer. Products like the original 2.5K Cinema Camera, the Raw enabled Pocket, 4K Production, URSA and now URSA Mini were designed to heavily underbid the Japanese on the value - if not sheer performance - scale and often succeeded in doing so. What held BMD back in several instances was that its execution and delivery hasn't always lived up to its promises. That, by itself, is poor marketing.Its called marketing and as one who works in marketing I can tell you BMD must be doing something right because their websites are usually very well received. Criticize them all you want but BMD will continue to draw eyes and the attention of people because they know how to brand well and market that brand. A lot of electronic companies having a hard time keeping their profits up there could learn a thing or two from BMD...
At some point, naturally, the niches currently occupied by BMD will be filled up with models manufactured by the Big Boys. Nikon, Canon, Sony, Olympus and Fuji
Here's the thing. It isn't that BMD is making a series of cameras with the superior technologies to the Big Boys. In its base, a camera is a sensor inside a computer and the Big Boys already have superior sensors (and anyone can assemble a computer, allowing for a variety of the DSLR or camcorder shapes). And so, ask yourself why Nikon or Sony doesn't make a 4K internal model based on D810 or A99. If Panasonic can make GH4, LX100 and FZ1000, why is there no competition from anyone else in that segment from any other Japanese company? Surely, the technology is not a secret. Hardware can be off the shelf. Surely, if Samsung can deliver NX1 for $1,300 and NX500 for $700, lens included, the Japanese photo/video giants can do this as well. And not only can they do sub-$1,500 models, they can do everything between the most affordable to the very best. So, why aren't they releasing a truckload of models? Well, the only feasible explanation I can come up with is the cartelization of the Japanese industry in general and the photo/video industry in particular. In other words, as it relates to the 4K video, they are not making the product they can make and that creates inefficiencies that can be explored (and BMD is smartly exploring them).I don't see this...
Here's the thing. It isn't that BMD is making a series of cameras with the superior technologies to the Big Boys. In its base, a camera is a sensor inside a computer and the Big Boys already have superior sensors (and anyone can assemble a computer, allowing for a variety of the DSLR or camcorder shapes). And so, ask yourself why Nikon or Sony doesn't make a 4K internal model based on D810 or A99. If Panasonic can make GH4, LX100 and FZ1000, why is there no competition from anyone else in that segment from any other Japanese company? Surely, the technology is not a secret. Hardware can be off the shelf. Surely, if Samsung can deliver NX1 for $1,300 and NX500 for $700, lens included, the Japanese photo/video giants can do this as well. And not only can they do sub-$1,500 models, they can do everything between the most affordable to the very best. So, why aren't they releasing a truckload of models? Well, the only feasible explanation I can come up with is the cartelization of the Japanese industry in general and the photo/video industry in particular. In other words, as it relates to the 4K video, they are not making the product they can make and that creates inefficiencies that can be explored (and BMD is smartly exploring them).
PS. combatentropy is fond of hypothetical camera design but here's what already should have been on the market -
Nikon should already have a full frame 6K model based on D810 for about $4,000, a 4K full frame based on D610 for about $2,500 and APS-C crop 4K based on D7200 for the NX1 level $1300. And, if they don't want to do 4K internally, they can run the HDMI 2.0a out to an external recorder for 4K 60p.
And you also get the auto focus and a full compatibility with the Nikon lens lineup.
Panasonic should have AF200 with an interchangeble MFT mount.
Et cetera, et cetera.
Would these cams fly off the shelves?
A little of topic: every time I go to BM website it makes me laugh/cringe when looking at their product photosIt's one of the weirdest presentation I have ever seen. Models holding their cameras, grading etc.
For example this one (nothing wrong with this guy, he's just doing his job - modelling, but combination of him and camera...) :
View attachment 100588
Has anyone of you in entire career have seen cameraman wearing make-up?![]()
Haha, Blackmagic, c'mon! This is so kitsch[/QUOTE)
I used to look this good...back when I had more hair!
Jim Martin
EVSonline.com
Regarding Blackmagic's marketing photos, I think you all will enjoy this, if you haven't seen it yet.
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showpost.php?p=7932040&postcount=117
t's an advantage for them to be the new guys. But, they are getting established now, and if it goes to their head is will be another Red
Their marketing pics are a f-ing riot. ANYONE who works in serious production thinks they are the stupidest looking photos ever taken with production gear. It's really silly. So dumb.
not sure i understand? i am generally not a fan of overly lit and airbrushed pics but that is pretty much any advertising right now? what is so dumb, stupid and silly about showing an idealized work environment? i would not mind working in that environment at all! or are you upset because it is so far from your reality? i don't see the average beer drinker in beer ads...especially light beers....Their marketing pics are a f-ing riot. ANYONE who works in serious production thinks they are the stupidest looking photos ever taken with production gear. It's really silly. So dumb.
A little of topic: every time I go to BM website it makes me laugh/cringe when looking at their product photosIt's one of the weirdest presentation I have ever seen. Models holding their cameras, grading etc.
For example this one (nothing wrong with this guy, he's just doing his job - modelling, but combination of him and camera...) :
View attachment 100588
Has anyone of you in entire career have seen cameraman wearing make-up?![]()
Haha, Blackmagic, c'mon! This is so kitsch[/QUOTE)
I used to look this good...back when I had more hair!
Jim Martin
EVSonline.com
You guys just don't get it!!! The clear, unmistakable subliminal inference is that purchasing and using the ursa mini (especially with the additional shoulder mount and viewfinder accessories) will cause you to look just like the model. That's why I placed my order! It's so simple!