Here's a comparison chart of the Digital Bolex and the Blackmagic camera:
http://nikitapavlov.com/blog/digital-bolex-d16-vs-blackmagic-cinema-camera-comparison-table/
thanks, for the excellent chart!
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's a comparison chart of the Digital Bolex and the Blackmagic camera:
http://nikitapavlov.com/blog/digital-bolex-d16-vs-blackmagic-cinema-camera-comparison-table/
And the price is the sweet spot. Y'know, it's been puzzling me, when did everyone all of a sudden decide that $9,000 or $14,000 or $16,000 cameras were affordable? This is a forum that was built on DVX100 and HVX200 users, and we laughed at and mocked Canon when they dared to introduce a $8,995 HDV camcorder, remember? Yet it sounds like everyone's saying "Well, I'm getting the $14,000 F3" and "I'm getting a $15,000 Scarlet" and "I'm getting the $9,000 FS700"... last I knew, the economy was still a disaster and yet everyone's talking about these (face it) really expensive cameras, so it's been a bit puzzling...
Glad to see that came through. I totally recognize that my particular frustrations are MY frustrations and while there may be some that share them, there are lots of folks (like you) who won't be bothered at all and will in fact embrace it specifically for those design choices.
It's all choices, you can't please everyone. Even so, I can probably make it work fine, and I'm just grumbling. Considering the price, I have no right to grumble... :thumbsup:
You did??? I'm shocked. I thought you were sooooooooooooooo sold! I kind of was too, up until I got the email where they said they didn't know if putting an OLPF in or not was the right thing to do. At that point it was like -- whoa -- you guys are way, way too premature with this, so I stepped out. Never thought you would though.
While I really like the BM, I think I am going with the FS700. The only thing keeping me from a pre-order is I want to see the new cinegamma settings and see if I can tame the highlight handling more to my liking. Other than that, it hits more points for me than the BM. That said, again, this is an AWESOME camera in specs so far, and I really look forward to seeing where they go with this even in future models. To have a start like this and a price point like this, my hat is off to them.
Thunderbot is coming to PC soon.Besides the Super16 sensor, tha fact that it is - again - Apple and Canon centered is a bit sobering.
To use the included Ultrascopes software you need a Thunderbolt laptop (aka MAC). The SSDs need to be MAC formated, which is a pain in the butt, if you are on a PC - meh.
And I wish they had also a Nikon mount, so I can finally dump all those adapters.
But damed, those pictures are tempting.
Frank
Right now, for sure. There's a chance that they can find a way to give up 60 before release date. Keep hope alive!
Not a chance. The other apps you listed is why this cam will be davinci packaged or nothing. They want you to use it.How about an option to buy the camera sans the software say for example $2,000.00 or even $2,500.00. Would be nice for those who already use Davinci or other color grading software such as Scratch. We use Scratch at work and will soon use SpeedGrade from Adobe.
According to the specs that someone posted in this thread, it features two balanced 1/4" TRS inputs. It's not as good as balanced locking XLR, but it's certainly the next best thing. Balanced 1/4" TRS is the format that most pros use to connect their studio monitors (powered speakers in the studio). If done right, this camera could sound awesome. Plus it has the ability to switch between Line and Mic (which is key), and it has a headphone out (beyond key). Not too shabbito.
Sure beats 1/8" miniI'm also a music producer. This is an absolutely pro input. XLRs would have been too much on a body like this...locking TSRs are standard studio connections as you point out...I have three pair connected with them in front of me.