Beginners Primer on 1080 and 720 i and p: Have I Got the Basics Correct??

Denniscasey

Well-known member
With apologies for this long note, I would appreciate comments on my understanding of shooting modes from my beginners perspective. Despite lots of reading on forum and Barry Green’s book, I am having trouble getting my head around various frames, fields, interlace, progressive and how HMC40 records and outputs and settings I should use for making Blu Ray (or AVCHD DVD) to view on my plasma TV. Within this are settings to compensate for rolling shutter issues with CMOS.

I will experiment and make mistakes on my own later, but for upcoming vacation can I selfishly draw on forum experience to see if my following understandings are correct for my purposes (don’t want to re-ignite previous discussions about “best” modes)—I don’t really have time now to experiment with many different options.

First, I do two basic types of hobby level shooting; (A) vacation scenery typically without a lot of fast moving action; (B) vintage sports car racing shooting fast moving cars.

Second, my intention is to burn Blu Ray discs to view on my plasma tv (42 inch at moment but dreams of building home theater with projector) and share with others who have Blu Ray players. For “rough cuts” plan to burn AVCHD on DVD discs (but that is another topic). I am not professional so won’t be providing footage to tv channels. I will edit on Avid Media Composer 5 (once I get my head around that).

Third, at the moment I moved from standard definition VX2000 camera to the HMC40 to get the “video” high definition look I see on high def television programming. Later on I will experiment with “film” look of 24p, but may give 1080 30p a pass.

Fourth, both Panasonic Blu Ray player and plasma tv I will be using support 1080 60i, 60p and 24p as well as 720 60p (and also support AVCHD—I can view HMC40 SD cards directly from the Blu Ray player)

Questions for comment:

1. I plan to begin vacation shooting in 1080 60i. If I wanted to capture frames from video to make still photos I might use 1080 30p. However, for video page 39 of Panasonic HMC40 PDF says following if you “Set camera to 30P mode (with 1080 mode): “
Quoting: “Shoot 30 frames a second in the progressive mode. For output and recording , the 30 frame per second signal is converted to 60 field per second interlace. This mode gives you high quality images.” End quote. I don’t really understand this but I take this to mean any output from camera via HDMI cable to tv or SD card to load into NLE editor will be 60i interlace anyhow?? So, temporal look of 30p will be different than shooting 1080 60i , but high definition “look” on TV will be same for both 1080 30p and 1080 60i????

There have been many comments about vertical resolution suffering in 60i because the interlacing means you have two fields of 540 vertical resolution—but to human eye viewing the video don’t you see one frame of 1080 vertical resolution?? Also, Barry notes on p 86 of his book to minimize skew associated with CMOS use a fast frame rate—recommends 1080 60i.

Also as Barry says on p 132 of his book: In interlaced mode (1080i/60i) the camera captures 59.94 progressive frames per second, but since there is not yet any established broadcast standard for 1080/60p the camera has to slice each progressive frame into fields (essentially half of a video frame, either the even lines or the odd lines). When set to 1080 interlaced mode these AVCCAM cameras simulate interlaced video and record interlaced video like any video camera.” So again, it seems human eye watching video will see 1080 vertical resolution.

2. For fast action sports cars I may use 720 60p. I do sometimes capture frames from video to print photos and the progressive mode would make batter photos I think than interlace mode of 1080 60i??? It has also been commented that 720 60p appears to have as good a high definition when viewed on tv and most tv sports programming is shot in 720 60p. However, what about skew due to CMOS scanning from top to bottom even in progressive mode—is 60 i still better than 60 p to avoid skew??? I typically pan with race cars as they go by and I never noticed any problems with the CCD sensors on my old Sony VX2000 ( I know they take a frame all at once) but may see a problem with CMOS??
 
Greetings Felipe, Thank you for comment and I can see benefits to progressive and I will note that. Perhaps 720 60p might be a good choice for me also. I do like to understand pros and cons so I hope my understandings as expressed in my first note are generally correct as they apply to my situation. Regards, Dennis
 
Greetings Felipe, Thank you for comment and I can see benefits to progressive and I will note that. Perhaps 720 60p might be a good choice for me also. I do like to understand pros and cons so I hope my understandings as expressed in my first note are generally correct as they apply to my situation. Regards, Dennis

PROS - 720 60P is great when you are doing slow motion in post or scenes with a lot of action, You can think like a shot plenty of information, so giving you a lot of detail in the movements.
CONS - Is not 1080 ( less resolution ), Eats more batteries, All your hardware and computer will work harder.

The frame frequency in 720 30P is 60P so each frame is recorded twice a top 60P.
If your TV screen is not larger than 40", 720 will work great.
The 1080 30P in this camera is recorded as a 60i stream but the images are captured and encoded as progressive.

In other words the resolution in one frame is better in 1080P BUT the motion is better in 720 30P and 60P, so make your choice depending on your target
 
Last edited:
My rules of thumb are:

For sports or other action footage, which would certainly include your auto racing, use 720p60.

For documentary, interview, instructional, home movies and most other projects involving mainly humans and intended for non-broadcast distribution, where a realistic "video" look is desired or at least acceptable, use 1080p30.

For narrative filmmaking with controlled lighting and camera movements, use 1080p24.

1080i60 would be a last choice for me only if a broadcaster required that specific format. Not having to look at interlaced video anymore has been one of the great joys of the digital/HD/Internet revolution in video production. It's not horrible, but definitely introduces some motion artifacts that I'd rather not live with if it isn't necessary.

The HMC40/80 enclose their 1080p30 data in a 1080i60 wrapper so it can travel over standard HDMI and SDI interfaces, but this gets unwound transparently at the editing and playback stage so the signal on the screen is always progressive.

Unlike many users here, I am not much of the time particularly interested in getting that "film look" in my images; what I want is pictures that reflect the reality in front of the camera as accurately and with as few unpleasant artifacts and distortions as possible. Therefore, I like 1080p30 better than 1080p24 most of the time, because the motion is reproduced more smoothly and with less potential flicker. However, some BluRay/monitor combinations don't support that format.

I suspect I'll be a big 1080p60 fan when and if that format becomes common and supported across a wide range of devices and distribution channels.

- Greg
 
While in theory 1080i is higher then 720p I find it to not be so true as many would hope. I have shot a lot of 720p 60p which I up convert to 1080i 60i by interleaving the alternate frames together. This method gives me 1080i that rivals most HDV cameras and is only slightly lower in resolution then the highest quality 1920x1080i cameras. You will find 720p 60p converted to 1080i is actually resolves more detail vertically then shooting native 1080i. Horizontally it about equals HDV's 1440 resolution and comes fairly close to 1920 for horizontal detail. Of course there is a bit of a loss but nowhere near what you would expect for the difference between 1080i 60i and 720p 60p. Of course shooting native 1080p is a bit different since progressive will always resolve more detail.

I recently shot some material intermixed with a 1080i HDV camera. I shot 720p 60p and my footage ended up being the sharper footage that resolved a lot more natural detail. Just a prime example of how resolution means nothing and it is what the sensors in the camera can do that really counts.
 
could you let us know how to upconvert from 720p 60p to 1080i?
what about upconverting to 1080p60? would that be possible too?
i'm always shooting 720P since my compter can't handle 1080 very well..but being able to upconvert the finished project to 1080p60p would be awesome.
While in theory 1080i is higher then 720p I find it to not be so true as many would hope. I have shot a lot of 720p 60p which I up convert to 1080i 60i by interleaving the alternate frames together. This method gives me 1080i that rivals most HDV cameras and is only slightly lower in resolution then the highest quality 1920x1080i cameras. You will find 720p 60p converted to 1080i is actually resolves more detail vertically then shooting native 1080i. Horizontally it about equals HDV's 1440 resolution and comes fairly close to 1920 for horizontal detail. Of course there is a bit of a loss but nowhere near what you would expect for the difference between 1080i 60i and 720p 60p. Of course shooting native 1080p is a bit different since progressive will always resolve more detail.

I recently shot some material intermixed with a 1080i HDV camera. I shot 720p 60p and my footage ended up being the sharper footage that resolved a lot more natural detail. Just a prime example of how resolution means nothing and it is what the sensors in the camera can do that really counts.
 
Well it is different for different systems but I have found Sony Vegas does a pretty decent job. You just put the 720p 60p video into a 1080i 60i project and it will do most of the work for you. I have only really used Vegas for converting files and I usually use Final Cut Pro. I believe the same is true there as well although I have never really tried it. Typically most of my stuff either stays 24p or 60p and I very rarely mix formats.

Also keep in mind there is very little reason for you to upconvert to 1080p if your delivery is Blu-ray. Blu-ray supports 1280x720p 60p and whatever HDTV the player is hooked up to will handle the upconversion for you. Save yourself the time and just create 720p.

Personally I prefer 720p for this reason. By shooting 720p 60p I can have a Blu-ray at 60p a DVD at 60i (ugh) a Apple device friendly 30p and a web friendly 30p all of the highest quality possible. Some DVD players will even play a 30p DVD if you make it correctly.
 
Very helpful input. I lack experience so still at "book learning" stage. But I do understand need to consider systems approach--how camera processes different modes; editing; output format (how I will view footage and share with friends); etc. As Greg mentioned some BluRay/monitor combinations don't support 1080 30p format so if I just burn a Blu Ray without doing some NLE manipulation it might not be a good choice for me for sharing with others via Blu Ray disc.

Can I just confirm however my understanding that when I select 1080 60i the HMC40 actually shoots 1080 60p frames then converts each frame to two interlaced fields. Each field one half vertical resolution (540) but, and this is really what I want to know, when viewed on TV I still "see" the full 1080 vertical resolution???

Stating up front that Barry's book does an excellent job pointing out "tradeoffs" inherent in many choices I think I understand from his book that there are some "technical" reasons for using 1080 60 i including: (1) on p 86 minimizing skew; (2) on p 64 higher color resolution than 720 and of course Barry lists several "cons" including the interlace "lines" you might see. Did I get that right???

Of course the overall "look" each person wants will over-ride these "technical" considerations , but in my defense I am still at the stage of trying to understand the various "technical" aspects of high def and the way HMC40 handles things.
 
Very helpful input. I lack experience so still at "book learning" stage. But I do understand need to consider systems approach--how camera processes different modes; editing; output format (how I will view footage and share with friends); etc. As Greg mentioned some BluRay/monitor combinations don't support 1080 30p format so if I just burn a Blu Ray without doing some NLE manipulation it might not be a good choice for me for sharing with others via Blu Ray disc.

Can I just confirm however my understanding that when I select 1080 60i the HMC40 actually shoots 1080 60p frames then converts each frame to two interlaced fields. Each field one half vertical resolution (540) but, and this is really what I want to know, when viewed on TV I still "see" the full 1080 vertical resolution???

Stating up front that Barry's book does an excellent job pointing out "tradeoffs" inherent in many choices I think I understand from his book that there are some "technical" reasons for using 1080 60 i including: (1) on p 86 minimizing skew; (2) on p 64 higher color resolution than 720 and of course Barry lists several "cons" including the interlace "lines" you might see. Did I get that right???

Of course the overall "look" each person wants will over-ride these "technical" considerations , but in my defense I am still at the stage of trying to understand the various "technical" aspects of high def and the way HMC40 handles things.

Forget about 60i unless a tv station requires you to shoot 60i, is lower quality.
Shoot 30P and render 1080 29.97 for Blu-ray
The blu-ray software will convert this to 1080 interlaced for compatibility with all blu-ray players.
Better learn to edit or you will hate video, TRY SONY VEGAS PRO
720 is motion oriented, works fine in monitors up to 40" great detail in the movement.
test and test and test
 
Last edited:
Felipe, over the years I was familiar with editing standard def on Avid/Pinnacle Liquid 7 which fit my needs nicely (did not face challenges of transcoding, converting to various formats, huge files of decompressed AVCHD, etc). Then Avid decided to drop Liquid and gave Liquid users a good price for Media Composer so that is one of my learning challenges. Anyhow, moving from tape based standard def (loved my Sony VX2000) to file based high def AVCHD (with its editing challenges) via HMC40 and beginning to learn Avid Media Composer has presented me with lots of "test and test and test" opportunities. Since video is an avocation and not a vocation for me I need to fit these testing "opportunities" around my "day job." This is where this forum and reading books like Barry's are so helpful in accelerating my learning curve and minimizing my mistakes.

You mention 720 "works fine in monitors up to 40"." Would 1080 30p be suggested format for going bigger than 40" monitor---one of my future projects is a home theater with plan to project onto 4 or 5 foot wide screen which is one reason I am migrating to high def . So I am planning ahead for viewing on that large screen with video I am shooting now. Dennis
 
Felipe, over the years I was familiar with editing standard def on Avid/Pinnacle Liquid 7 which fit my needs nicely (did not face challenges of transcoding, converting to various formats, huge files of decompressed AVCHD, etc). Then Avid decided to drop Liquid and gave Liquid users a good price for Media Composer so that is one of my learning challenges. Anyhow, moving from tape based standard def (loved my Sony VX2000) to file based high def AVCHD (with its editing challenges) via HMC40 and beginning to learn Avid Media Composer has presented me with lots of "test and test and test" opportunities. Since video is an avocation and not a vocation for me I need to fit these testing "opportunities" around my "day job." This is where this forum and reading books like Barry's are so helpful in accelerating my learning curve and minimizing my mistakes.

You mention 720 "works fine in monitors up to 40"." Would 1080 30p be suggested format for going bigger than 40" monitor---one of my future projects is a home theater with plan to project onto 4 or 5 foot wide screen which is one reason I am migrating to high def . So I am planning ahead for viewing on that large screen with video I am shooting now. Dennis

Dennis , fine enjoy your camera, Vegas doesn't need to transcode, and is very efficient, versatile, Try it
 
Back
Top